2017
DOI: 10.2172/1372112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GAMSOR: Gamma Source Preparation and DIF3D Flux Solution

Abstract: 60439. For information about Argonne and its pioneering science and technology programs, see www.anl.gov.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple 2D and 1D problems were constructed based on fast reactor compositions to verify the gamma library and calculation using MC 2 -3/DIF3D/GAMSOR (hereafter DIF3D represents DIF3D-VARIANT). For 2D problems [6], two configurations were set up based upon a simple 2D. One is a uranium dominated core region in the core region with the control rod inserted in the outer core region (case 1), as shown in Figure 3-6.…”
Section: Simple Benchmark Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simple 2D and 1D problems were constructed based on fast reactor compositions to verify the gamma library and calculation using MC 2 -3/DIF3D/GAMSOR (hereafter DIF3D represents DIF3D-VARIANT). For 2D problems [6], two configurations were set up based upon a simple 2D. One is a uranium dominated core region in the core region with the control rod inserted in the outer core region (case 1), as shown in Figure 3-6.…”
Section: Simple Benchmark Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the new gamma library, attempts were made to verify the neutron and gamma heating data for individual isotopes and to solve the EBR-II 138B benchmark problem again to confirm the previous calculation results and compare solution accuracies between the current and new libraries. In addition, the 2D benchmark problem discussed in the GAMSOR manual [6] was revisited since noticeable errors in gamma heatings in the non-fuel regions were reported in the document. For further investigation, simpler 1D benchmark problems were devised to compare neutron and gamma heating between MC 2 -3/DIF3D/GAMSOR and MCNP, in which no contribution of delayed gamma and betas were considered for the consistent comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The REBUS software uses the DIF3D software at each time step of the fuel cycle to obtain the steady state neutron flux solution and has a very specific methodology about how the flux solution changes over the time step to produce the correct fuel transmutation. The REBUS software provides a snapshot of the reactor state at each time point which can be used to define the input for GAMSOR software [8]. GAMSOR is a wrapper around the DIF3D software to allow the user to compute the coupled neutron-gamma transport calculation and produce both neutron and gamma heating throughout the modeled reactor system.…”
Section: Verification and Validation Problem Setup And Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This document discusses the intended software verification and validation plan for the Argonne Reactor Code (ARC) software package [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] as part of the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) program. The ARC software package consists of steady state neutronics and thermal hydraulics modeling capabilities which are being used by the VTR program to develop most of the VTR reactor design details which will be part of the licensing application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current focus of the Workbench integration is on the deterministic neutronic codes. It includes MC2-3 [6] for multi-group cross-section processing, DIF3D [7] for flux calculation, REBUS-3 [8] for depletion and equilibrium calculations, PERSENT [9] for perturbation theory calculations (perturbation, sensitivity and uncertainty quantification), and GAMSOR [10] for gamma heating calculations. These ARC codes are used at national laboratories, universities, and companies for advanced reactor analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%