2004
DOI: 10.1080/07418820400095991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gang membership and violent victimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
206
2
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
206
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is only fitting, then, that in their discussion of their longitudinal findings on gang membership and victimization, Peterson et al (2004) aligned their results with Thornberry et al's (1993) selection, facilitation, and enhancement models which were introduced originally to explain the relationship between gang membership and offending. DeLisi et al (2009) formally extended this theoretical model to gang membership and victimization in framing their national study.…”
Section: Gang Membership and Violent Victimization In Contextmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is only fitting, then, that in their discussion of their longitudinal findings on gang membership and victimization, Peterson et al (2004) aligned their results with Thornberry et al's (1993) selection, facilitation, and enhancement models which were introduced originally to explain the relationship between gang membership and offending. DeLisi et al (2009) formally extended this theoretical model to gang membership and victimization in framing their national study.…”
Section: Gang Membership and Violent Victimization In Contextmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Variables used in the propensity score model include demographic factors, wave 1 values of proposed mediators, and victimization at wave 1, because it is a reason for joining gangs (Peterson et al 2004) and it predicts future victimization (Farrell and Pease 2001;Turanovic and Pratt 2014), along with other community, school, and individual levels predictors of gang joining behavior (see Appendix 3). The propensity score, as wells as demographic characteristics and wave 1 values of proposed mediators, is then used as a control variable in the mediation analysis to test the effect of gang membership at wave 2 on violent victimization in waves 2 and 3 (Melde and Esbensen 2011).…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted by Peterson, Taylor, and Esbensen (2004) reported delinquency rates, as well as violent victimization rates, for gang members at a significantly greater level than those for their non-gang counterparts. Furthermore, in a study conducted by Harper and Robinson (1999), gang members reported more frequent indicators of criminal involvement such as weapon carrying, physical fighting, and attacking behavior, as compared to nonmembers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les membres de gangs, plus que tout autre délinquant, sont engagés dans des conflits violents (Bouchard et Spindler, 2010 ;Decker, 1996 ;Melde, Taylor et Esbensen 2009 ;Peterson, Taylor et Esbensen, 2004). Lorsque la propension à la violence se transforme en une surexposition à une violente victimisation, certains membres préfèrent quitter leur gang.…”
Section: Incitations à La Désaffiliationunclassified