2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness in Retinal Diseases: Repeatability Study of Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ctori I et al [56] also demonstrated that Spectralis SD-OCT segmentation software had excellent repeatability and reproducibility for each of eight individual retinal layer thickness measurements in healthy adults. However, the repeatability of GCIPL thickness measurements was lower in macular edema and atrophy patients [35]. The current study considered individual ocular biometry, including refractive error, and excluded patients with the presence of DME and other diseases affecting retinal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ctori I et al [56] also demonstrated that Spectralis SD-OCT segmentation software had excellent repeatability and reproducibility for each of eight individual retinal layer thickness measurements in healthy adults. However, the repeatability of GCIPL thickness measurements was lower in macular edema and atrophy patients [35]. The current study considered individual ocular biometry, including refractive error, and excluded patients with the presence of DME and other diseases affecting retinal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The averaged thicknesses of 3 circles and 9 sectors of the following layers were recorded in microns ( Fig 2B ) : the RNFL, GCL, IPL, inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), inner retinal layer (IRL), outer retinal layer (ORL) and total retina (TR). Because many researchers have utilized the GCIPL thickness and photoreceptor layer (PR) thickness [3537], we also included these parameters in our analysis. The GCIPL and PR thicknesses were measured as the distances between the RNFL and IPL and between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and RPE, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 In a similar manner, we estimated the low repeatability of VD measurements using OCTA in patients with a low BCVA compared with patients with a good BCVA because of an unstable gaze. However, multivariate regression did not show statistically significant results.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these commercial methods also require human interaction to initiate or refine the segmentation results [11][12][13], which can be timeconsuming. In addition, recent publications have reported substantial errors in their results [14][15][16][17]. A number of experimental algorithms have also been proposed by research groups, either in two-dimensional individual scans [18,19] or taking advantage of the threedimensional nature of the acquired data, considering a priori determined smoothness, continuity and layer interaction constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general graph-based approach for the segmentation of surfaces was proposed in [20], with applications to volumetric OCT data in [21][22][23][24] Although these and other automated or semi-automated segmentation methods have been applied to SD-OCT images [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], they have a number of limitations. First, most segmentation algorithms fail to produce acceptable results in complicated cases, such as severe retinal deformities [15][16][17]36] or in lower quality scans that are routinely found in clinical practice. Second, most methods were designed for use with SD-OCT images acquired by experimental systems or from a particular vendor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%