2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GANsDTA: Predicting Drug-Target Binding Affinity Using GANs

Abstract: The computational prediction of interactions between drugs and targets is a standing challenge in drug discovery. State-of-the-art methods for drug-target interaction prediction are primarily based on supervised machine learning with known label information. However, in biomedicine, obtaining labeled training data is an expensive and a laborious process. This paper proposes a semi-supervised generative adversarial networks (GANs)-based method to predict binding affinity. Our method comprises two parts, two GAN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, deep-learning techniques that automatically capture feature representation show great performance improvement. The * denote the proposed architecture The * denote the proposed architecture First, this paper considers a few recent textual representation approaches such as: DeepDTA [29], MT-DTI [32], Deep-CPI [28], WideDTA [7], GANsDTA [13], and Attention-DTA [14]. Among these approaches, Attention-DTA and MT-DTI yielded best results with CI of 0.887, MSE of 0.245 on the Davis dataset; also, on the KIBA dataset, they both achieved CI of 0.882 and MSE of 0.220 and 0.162 respectively.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, deep-learning techniques that automatically capture feature representation show great performance improvement. The * denote the proposed architecture The * denote the proposed architecture First, this paper considers a few recent textual representation approaches such as: DeepDTA [29], MT-DTI [32], Deep-CPI [28], WideDTA [7], GANsDTA [13], and Attention-DTA [14]. Among these approaches, Attention-DTA and MT-DTI yielded best results with CI of 0.887, MSE of 0.245 on the Davis dataset; also, on the KIBA dataset, they both achieved CI of 0.882 and MSE of 0.220 and 0.162 respectively.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], Ozkirimli et al introduce a methodology for predicting DT binding affinities using CNN over word representation of protein and compound sequences demonstrating that most essential binding information implanted in the protein domain. Zhao et al [13] proposed a generative adversarial network (GAN) to learn beneficial patterns within labeled and unlabeled sequences and utilized convolutional regression to forecast binding affinity score. However, they did not address GAN training on a small dataset.…”
Section: A Drug-target Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Zhao et al [18] proposed an end-to-end model, associated with an attention mechanism, to predict the binding affinity of DTIs. Zhao et al [19] proposed a neural network, GANsDTA, which combined two Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and a regression network to predict binding affinity. Those deep learning models show great promise for identifying DTIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%