2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)te.1943-5436.0000217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gap Acceptance at Priority-Controlled Intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one, proposed by Harders (1968), based on gap acceptance theory, has been widely adopted for the analysis of minor stream entries into, or across, a major stream of vehicles that exercises absolute priority (Brilon and Wu 1999;Pollatschek et al 2002;Guo and Lin 2011). The second type was presented by Brilon and Wu (2001) in terms of the traffic conflict technique, and was later improved and expanded by other researchers, including Brilon and Miltner (2005), Li and Deng (2008), and Li et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first one, proposed by Harders (1968), based on gap acceptance theory, has been widely adopted for the analysis of minor stream entries into, or across, a major stream of vehicles that exercises absolute priority (Brilon and Wu 1999;Pollatschek et al 2002;Guo and Lin 2011). The second type was presented by Brilon and Wu (2001) in terms of the traffic conflict technique, and was later improved and expanded by other researchers, including Brilon and Miltner (2005), Li and Deng (2008), and Li et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, specific features of the low-priority car drivers play a crucial role, in terms of the way that individual car drivers choose their critical headways. In the existing literature, various models have been studied, the simplest variant being that all low-priority drivers use the same deterministic critical headway T [8]. A second, more realistic, model allows different values of T according to some probabilistic distribution [9,21], where T is resampled for any new attempt at crossing the main road.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One feature of METANET is that the inflow and outflow for each node is characterised by turning ratios of traffic flows from each link that is connected to the node, as a result the effects of conflicting requirements of the traffic flows from competing directions at priority junctions are not considered. Furthermore, gap acceptance theory and queuing theory have been extensively applied to investigate the traffic at different junctions (Brilon et al, 1999;Cowan, 1975;Daganzo, 1977;Kremser, 1962;Kremser 1964;Ning, 2001;Plank and Catchpole, 1984;Siegloch, 1973;Tanner, 1962;Troutbeck and Brilon, 1997;Guo and Lin, 2011;Doan and Ukkusuri, 2012;Weng and Meng, 2013;Ma et al, 2013;Carey et al, 2014). However, some of the models can become inefficient when modelling directional flow and identifying traffic behaviours at network level (Robinson et al, 1999;Ruskin and Wang, 2002;Tian et al, 2000;Tracz and Gondek, 2000;Chen and Kasikitwiwat, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%