We propose that screened pairing interactions mediated by phonons could give rise to a spin triplet superconductivity in ferromagnetic compounds such as UGe2. It is pointed out that the pairing interactions include anisotropic components such as those of p, d, f -waves in addition to dominant s-wave component due to the momentum dependence. Since the ferromagnetic longrange order coexists, there is a large splitting of the Fermi surfaces of up and down spin electrons, which suppresses singlet pairing. Therefore, triplet pairing occurs at last due to the sub-dominant anisotropic interactions, even in the absence of magnetic contribution to the pairing interactions.Recently, a coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetic long-range order was observed in UGe 2 under pressure [1]. In the phase diagram on the pressure and temperature plane the superconductivity appears inside the area of the ferromagnetic phase. For this proximity of the superconductivity and the ferromagnetism, spin triplet superconductivity is a possible candidate in this compound.In addition, singlet pairing is considered to be unfavalable in this compound. The ferromagnetism and superconductivity occur in the same electron band [1,2] or at least in very close electron bands from the crystal structure. Thus, there is a large Fermi surface splitting, which suppresses antiparallel spin pairing, in the electron band responsible to the superconductivity.As a mechanism of triplet pairing, magnetically mediated superconductivity has been considered [1]. However, there are some behaviors which are not easily explained only by this mechanism. For example, the magnetic fluctuations and their contribution to the pairing interactions increase near the transition points. Such behavior is reproduced in the calculation of Fay and Appel [3]. In their calculation, it decreases in a narrow region of the width of 1% of the exchange interaction parameter near the second order transition point, but this decrease would not occur in UGe 2 , since the magnetic transition is of first order in UGe 2 . Therefore, the superconducting transition temperature seems to increase as the magnetic boundary is approached in this mechanism. However, in the observation, T c decreases near the phase boundary (∼ 1.6GPa) within the width of ∼ 0.3GPa of the pressure, which is not very narrow.Decreases of the superconducting transition temperatures as the magnetic phase approached were also observed in high-T c superconductors. However, in those compounds, the magnetic phase is antiferromagnetism. Thus, we have a physical explanation of the decrease of the superconducting transition temperature based on the reduction of the density of states near the Fermi surface (pseudogap) due to the antiferromagnetic fluctuations [4]. On the other hand, the ferromagnetic fluctuations do not induce any pseudogap near the Fermi surface, since it is split to two surfaces.On the other hand, if the decrease of the superconducting transition temperature near the magnetic phase boundary at the high pres...