1995
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4534(95)00294-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gap anisotropy and van Hove singularities in high-Tc superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is known, the anisotropy of a superconducting order parameter Δ can be caused by the following factors: basic deviation of the symmetry type from the s-wave, i.e., by the presence of an angular gap amplitude distribution Δ(θ) in the k-space [101,102]; the splitting of the gap amplitude, due to degeneracy removing for condensate, realized on the Fermi surfaces with similar geometry and slightly different momentum modules (e.g., nested); by the variation of the gap in the real space, for example due to an inhomogeneous distribution of impurities or dopant.…”
Section: The Effect Of Multiple Andreev Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is known, the anisotropy of a superconducting order parameter Δ can be caused by the following factors: basic deviation of the symmetry type from the s-wave, i.e., by the presence of an angular gap amplitude distribution Δ(θ) in the k-space [101,102]; the splitting of the gap amplitude, due to degeneracy removing for condensate, realized on the Fermi surfaces with similar geometry and slightly different momentum modules (e.g., nested); by the variation of the gap in the real space, for example due to an inhomogeneous distribution of impurities or dopant.…”
Section: The Effect Of Multiple Andreev Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of on-site Coulomb repulsion, extremely anisotropic s-wave order parameter with nodes was obtained [18]. Bouvier and Bok also calculated an order parameter explicitly, and obtained anisotropic s-wave in the same model [19]. Recently, it has been shown that d-wave superconductivity is reproduced in a similar model with antiferromagnetic fluctuations [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For the rapid increase of λ 1 , the condition λ 0 −ũ < λ 1 is realized more easily in layer systems than in usual three dimensional systems, where λ 0 denotes the s-wave coupling constant and −ũ is a negative contribution to swave pairing due to the short-range Coulomb repulsion discussed near eq. (19). Hence triplet pairing superconductivity is favored in layered compounds.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interaction has been examined by many authors [6][7][8][9] for the high-T c superconductivity. As explained in the text books, near the Fermi surface where |ξ| < ∼ ω(q), the interaction is attractive due to overscreening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The momentum dependence of the pairing interactions was examined, where screening effect was taken into account. Bouvier and Bok calculated the superconducting gap and obtained anisotropic momentum dependence of the gap function [7] in the same model. Recently, Friedel and Kohmoto [8], and Chang, Friedel, and Kohmoto [9] have shown that d-wave superconductivity is induced by screened phonon interactions with an assist of a contribution from the antiferromagnetic fluctuations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%