2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7ffb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gap Opening and Inner Disk Structure in the Strongly Accreting Transition Disk of DM Tau

Abstract: Large inner dust gaps in transition disks are frequently posited as evidence of giant planets sculpting gas and dust in the disk, or the opening of a gap by photoevaporative winds. Although the former hypothesis is strongly supported by the observations of planets and deep depletions in gas within the gap in some disks, many T Tauri stars hosting transition disks accrete at rates typical for an undepleted disk, raising the question of how gap opening occurs in these objects. We thus present an analysis of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured accretion rates for the 13 disks with inverse P Cygni-like Lyα emission range from M M 5 10 3 10 ´-  yr −1 for CVSO 109A; Pittman et al 2022), confirming that accretion rates can remain high even as material is dissipated from the outer disks. This is consistent with submm observations, which still show significant gas abundances in disks with high accretion rates and large dust cavities or gaps (see, e.g., Bruderer 2013;Espaillat et al 2014;Kudo et al 2018;Francis et al 2022).…”
Section: Model H I Velocities Probe Kinematics Of Accretion and Outflowssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The measured accretion rates for the 13 disks with inverse P Cygni-like Lyα emission range from M M 5 10 3 10 ´-  yr −1 for CVSO 109A; Pittman et al 2022), confirming that accretion rates can remain high even as material is dissipated from the outer disks. This is consistent with submm observations, which still show significant gas abundances in disks with high accretion rates and large dust cavities or gaps (see, e.g., Bruderer 2013;Espaillat et al 2014;Kudo et al 2018;Francis et al 2022).…”
Section: Model H I Velocities Probe Kinematics Of Accretion and Outflowssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…DM Tau shows opposite behavior, where infalling H I has absorbed photons on the red side of the line profile. The schematic on the right illustrates this stage, showing that large dust gaps consistent with models of planet-disk interactions have been cleared in the dust distributions (see, e.g., DM Tau; Hashimoto et al 2021;Francis et al 2022). Low-velocity components of [O I] 6300 Å and [Ne II] 12.81 μm emission lines are still observed, consistent with origins in MHD winds (see, e.g., Banzatti et al 2019;Pascucci et al 2020) or photoevaporative flows (Pascucci & Sterzik 2009).…”
Section: Shell Models With Lyα Emission and Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if the high accretion rate implied by observations is generated by magnetorotational instability viscosity, it would mean that this source is not a low-viscosity but a high-viscosity system (Delage et al 2022). This would require a sufficiently massive planet (maybe nearly 10 times the mass of Jupiter) to produce such structures (Pinilla et al 2012;Francis et al 2022). Moreover, massive planets will carve out eccentric gaps and generate streamer structures (Chen et al 2024); thus, the hypothesis of a single massive planet would have difficulty generating the observed asymmetric structures in DM Tau.…”
Section: The Dm Tau Disk Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For disks in which only upper limits were obtained with HIFI and PACS, only DM Tau (for which deep observations have been obtained at 269.27 and 538.29 μm) is notably discrepant with the models. While we do not have a model specific to this disk, Francis et al (2022) recently modeled spatially resolved ALMA emission from the DM Tau disk in detail and derived gas and dust masses of ∼6 × 10 −3 and ∼6 × 10 −4 M e , respectively. Their adopted surface density distribution is very similar to our models for the same mass disk, and tapers off at r = 126 au.…”
Section: Comparison With Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%