1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00308-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gap-phase regeneration in longleaf pine wiregrass ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
117
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
117
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In higher latitude on the northern hemisphere a high relative PAR-intensity on the northern edge of a gap and a low relative PAR-intensity on the southern part of a gap can be found (Canham et al 1990). In contrast to relative PAR, assuming a distance dependency of fine root density distribution (Ammer and Wagner 2005;Zerihun et al 2007), root density is constant in a particular distance to the gap edge (Brockway and Outcalt 1998;Ammer and Wagner 2002;Müller and Wagner 2003). However, while in the controlled factorial experiment no significant correlation between relative PAR and SW values was observed, a weak but significant correlation was given in the field experiment between relative PAR and IRI although we carried out the investigation using gaps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In higher latitude on the northern hemisphere a high relative PAR-intensity on the northern edge of a gap and a low relative PAR-intensity on the southern part of a gap can be found (Canham et al 1990). In contrast to relative PAR, assuming a distance dependency of fine root density distribution (Ammer and Wagner 2005;Zerihun et al 2007), root density is constant in a particular distance to the gap edge (Brockway and Outcalt 1998;Ammer and Wagner 2002;Müller and Wagner 2003). However, while in the controlled factorial experiment no significant correlation between relative PAR and SW values was observed, a weak but significant correlation was given in the field experiment between relative PAR and IRI although we carried out the investigation using gaps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the experimental plots, C and N concentrations were higher near the trunk where litter accumulation and forest floor depth are generally greater [19,51,52]. Indeed, Varner et al [22] reported that without fire, litter from pines and hardwoods could accumulate as deep as 25 cm near the trunk of large trees.…”
Section: Soil Gradientmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Trees can create gradients in soil moisture [4][5][6], temperature [7,8], texture [9], carbon (C) and nutrient accumulation and turnover [10][11][12], understory species composition through spatially distinct effects via litter accumulation [1,12,13], stemflow and throughfall [14,15], light and precipitation interception [16][17][18] and root distribution [8,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gap was defined as any opening with a diameter of at least 24 m measured between the bases of living non-lightning affected trees. This distance was chosen to represent a true gap because this is the threshold where probability of successful longleaf regeneration markedly increases in sandhills habitat of this region (Brockway and Outcalt, 1998).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%