Gaps and strategies in developing health research capacity: experience from the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance

Abstract

BackgroundDespite being disproportionately burdened by preventable diseases than more advanced countries, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) continue to trail behind other parts of the world in the number, quality and impact of scholarly activities by their health researchers. Our strategy at the Nigerian Implementation Science Alliance (NISA) is to utilise innovative platforms that catalyse collaboration, enhance communication between different stakeholders, and promote the uptake of evidence-based interventions in improving healthcare delivery. This article reports on findings from a structured group exercise conducted at the 2016 NISA Conference to identify (1) gaps in developing research capacity and (2) potential strategies to address these gaps.MethodsA 1-hour structured group exercise was conducted with 15 groups of 2–9 individuals (n = 94) to brainstorm gaps for implementation, strategies to address gaps and to rank their top 3 in each category. Qualitative thematic analysis was used. First, duplicate responses were merged and analyses identified emerging themes. Each of the gaps and strategies identified were categorised as falling into the purview of policy-makers, researchers, implementing partners or multiple groups.ResultsParticipating stakeholders identified 98 gaps and 91 strategies related to increasing research capacity in Nigeria. A total of 45 gaps and an equal number of strategies were ranked; 39 gaps and 43 strategies were then analysed, from which 8 recurring themes emerged for gaps (lack of sufficient funding, poor research focus in education, inadequate mentorship and training, inadequate research infrastructure, lack of collaboration between researchers, research-policy dissonance, lack of motivation for research, lack of leadership buy-in for research) and 7 themes emerged for strategies (increased funding for research, improved research education, improved mentorship and training, improved infrastructure for research, increased collaboration between academic/research institutions, greater engagement between researchers and policy-makers, greater leadership buy-in for research).ConclusionsThe gaps and strategies identified in this study represent pathways judged to be important in increasing research and implementation science capacity in Nigeria. The inclusion of perspectives and involvement of stakeholders who play different roles in policy, research and implementation activities makes these findings comprehensive, relevant and actionable, not only in Nigeria but in other similar LMICs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0289-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The value of case reports in democratising evidence from resource-limited settings: results of an exploratory survey

“…However, it clearly demonstrates that CRs are a recognised method of communicating the experience of educational and clinical value to a wide community and that there are currently significant barriers to the dissemination of such knowledge from HRLS. These barriers include insufficient skills and experience in writing CRs, together with potential financial cost, as other studies have suggested [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”

“…In 2004-2006, a series of articles took a closer look at this gap and suggested that second-and third-world authors fear rejection, have insufficient writing skills, and overall lack incentive to engage in science [2][3][4][5][6]. Since then, other studies have shown also that scientists from developing countries are poorly represented on editorial boards of prestigious journals and that there is a higher peer rejection rate for papers submitted by authors in middle-and low-income countries [7][8][9][10][11].…”

Leveraging implementation science to reduce inequities in Children’s mental health care: highlights from a multidisciplinary international colloquium

“…Recently, the field of implementation science has emerged to promote and accelerate the systematic uptake of EBPs into community service settings to optimize public health impact [16]. Implementation science is a rapidly growing field as evidenced by multiple investigations of large-scale implementation efforts happening in the United States [17], Europe [18], Africa [19,20], and Latin America [21]. Several implementation models and frameworks have been developed to describe, guide, and evaluate implementation efforts [22,23].…”

Opportunities and challenges to Integrating mental health into HIV programs in a Low- and Middle-Income Country: Insights from the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance

“…The Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance (NISA) was established in 2015 as a robust partnership of 20 organizations that includes academic and non-governmental organizations, clinical service providers, and policy makers involved in HIV care in Nigeria (26). NISA is aimed at facilitating collaboration among partners, bridging research-to-practice gaps through application of implementation science approaches and implementation research in Nigeria and other countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, and identifying feasible and culturally appropriate strategies for improving public health through research (26,27). Yearly, NISA conferences have focused on "Prevention of mother to child HIV transmission(PMTCT)" (2015), "HIV/AIDS and related infections, adolescents health, STI & Hepatitis B" (2016), "Improving Health through Implementation Science & Research" (2017) and "Evidence-based approaches to enhance quality of care" (2018) (26)(27)(28).…”