1997
DOI: 10.1080/1350462970030305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaps between Advocated Practices and Teaching Realities in Environmental Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of attitude studies have reported a rhetoric-reality gap in environmental education (Agyeman, 1998;Gayford, 1998;Lane, Wilkie & Sivek, 1996;Robertson & Krugly-Smolska, 1997;Sauvé, Boutard, Begin & Orellana, 1997). By falling into existing high school science practices, environmental education may be compromising its interdisciplinary goals.…”
Section: Issues In Evaluation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of attitude studies have reported a rhetoric-reality gap in environmental education (Agyeman, 1998;Gayford, 1998;Lane, Wilkie & Sivek, 1996;Robertson & Krugly-Smolska, 1997;Sauvé, Boutard, Begin & Orellana, 1997). By falling into existing high school science practices, environmental education may be compromising its interdisciplinary goals.…”
Section: Issues In Evaluation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, very few studies on environmental education approaches directly examine the views of the teachers (Robertson & Krugly-Smolska, 1997). The…”
Section: Chapter Vi: Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the substance of the SCAA (1996) guidance on environmental education, used as the main reference document in Changing Places, has been critiqued by many researchers (e.g. Huckle, 1996;Job, 1996;Robertson & Krugly-Smoleska, 1997). The absence of any deeper analysis on this and other 'opportunities' for planners to link children's participation to a variety of contexts creates an introductory section to the book that reads too much like a collection of handy rhetorical pieces that would look good on a funding application.…”
Section: Stephen Sterlingmentioning
confidence: 99%