2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02295-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

gapseq: informed prediction of bacterial metabolic pathways and reconstruction of accurate metabolic models

Abstract: Genome-scale metabolic models of microorganisms are powerful frameworks to predict phenotypes from an organism’s genotype. While manual reconstructions are laborious, automated reconstructions often fail to recapitulate known metabolic processes. Here we present (https://github.com/jotech/gapseq), a new tool to predict metabolic pathways and automatically reconstruct microbial metabolic models using a curated reaction database and a novel gap-filling algorithm. On the basis of scientific literature and experi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
221
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(198 reference statements)
1
221
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then used ANTISMASH [ 42 ] to identify gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of cyanopeptides and other pathways of interest. We further validated the presence of biosynthetic pathways like biotin, cobalamin, nitrogen fixation and carotenoids with gapseq [ 43 ]. As expected for distantly related bacteria, Microcystis genotypes and AB encode distinct sets of gene functions based on the presence/absence of annotated genes (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then used ANTISMASH [ 42 ] to identify gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of cyanopeptides and other pathways of interest. We further validated the presence of biosynthetic pathways like biotin, cobalamin, nitrogen fixation and carotenoids with gapseq [ 43 ]. As expected for distantly related bacteria, Microcystis genotypes and AB encode distinct sets of gene functions based on the presence/absence of annotated genes (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KEGG modules differentially abundant in Microcystis or the AB genus were filtered based on a completeness greater or equal to 70%. Additionally, we used the program gapseq (v1.1) with default parameters and the MetaCyc database [ 43 , 45 ] to validate the presence the metabolic pathways involved in the biosynthesis of biotin, cobalamin, thiamine, carotenoid and nitrogen fixation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the integration of multi-omics has been shown to yield superior output compared to single omic studies. For instance, the co-assembly of MG and MT sequencing reads was shown to improve the quality of assembled contigs ( Narayanasamy et al, 2016 ), which in turn improves taxonomic annotation, gene calling/annotation, binning, metabolic pathway (re) construction ( Muller et al, 2018 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ; Zimmermann et al, 2021 ), and quantification of features, e.g., taxa/genes ( Narayanasamy et al, 2016 ). Similarly, MP spectra searches are more effective when performed against gene databases derived from MG assemblies of the same sample/environment, compared to generic databases, thus improving the recruitment of measured peptides ( Tanca et al, 2016 ; Heyer et al, 2017 ; Timmins-Schiffman et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Multi-omic Considerations and Experimental Design For Longitudinal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another tool, Functional Ontology Assignments for Metagenomes (FOAM), although including biogeochemical cycling genes, does not permit visualization to facilitate interpreting functional profiles, and it annotates all protein sequences with a universal threshold value, which may lead to prediction biases ( Prestat et al, 2014 ). Some tools can be used in the analysis of genome, metagenome or metatranscriptome, e.g., METABOLIC ( Zhou et al, 2020 ), iPATH ( Darzi et al, 2018 ), gapseq ( Zimmermann et al, 2021 ), MEGAN ( Huson et al, 2007 ), and SAMSA2 ( Westreich et al, 2018 ). The METABOLIC ( Zhou et al, 2020 ) toolkit can assess microbial ecology and biogeochemistry based on evaluating the completeness of pathways in genomes or/and metagenome-assembled genomes, but is not directly based on calculating the relative abundance of pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The METABOLIC ( Zhou et al, 2020 ) toolkit can assess microbial ecology and biogeochemistry based on evaluating the completeness of pathways in genomes or/and metagenome-assembled genomes, but is not directly based on calculating the relative abundance of pathways. iPath ( Darzi et al, 2018 ) and gapseq ( Zimmermann et al, 2021 ) are applications for the visualization and analysis of metabolic pathways in a cellular genome or a set of gene sequences, but not metagenomes. These two applications do not specialize in the biogeochemical cycle and cannot calculate the relative abundance of pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%