2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas-assisted mold temperature control for improving the quality of injection molded parts with fiber additives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows that the temperature difference is 44.3 ∘ C, 11.3 ∘ C, and 0.3 ∘ C when the mold gap size is 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm, respectively. This result is in good agreement with our previous research [2,15].…”
Section: Effect Of Gmtc On the Heating Processsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 7 shows that the temperature difference is 44.3 ∘ C, 11.3 ∘ C, and 0.3 ∘ C when the mold gap size is 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm, respectively. This result is in good agreement with our previous research [2,15].…”
Section: Effect Of Gmtc On the Heating Processsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In our former study, when the GMTC was used for mold surface heating, there is a temperature difference between the inlet and outlet area [2,15]. Therefore, in this research, to evaluate the uniformity of the heating process for various mold gap sizes, the temperature at the gas inlet area and the gas outlet area was collected.…”
Section: Effect Of Gmtc On the Heating Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, a thickness of 8 mm and the gas injection on the legs was established. It is well known that after production, the internal width of the chair legs will not be constant (Chen et al 2011), therefore, a less favorable situation was assumed for the requirement calculation. The geometric model for the calculation did not consider rounded edges, so a stress concentration in the base of the chair legs was expected, which involved an extra security factor.…”
Section: Product Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%