1991
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(91)85032-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters: Avoiding discrimination by programmed temperature vaporizing injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The detector temperature was 300°C. Fatty acid methyl esters were identified by comparing their retention times with those of individual purified standards and quantified with heptadecanoic acid methyl ester as internal standard (15). The amounts of individual hepatic phospholipids [phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine, diacyl (PE)] were calculated by the amount of their bound fatty acids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detector temperature was 300°C. Fatty acid methyl esters were identified by comparing their retention times with those of individual purified standards and quantified with heptadecanoic acid methyl ester as internal standard (15). The amounts of individual hepatic phospholipids [phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine, diacyl (PE)] were calculated by the amount of their bound fatty acids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Table 2 for column heading explanations. b Means were compared by Fisher's multiple range test; means not sharing a common superscript letter are significantly different at P < 0.05. c Fe− means iron-deficient groups, Fe+ means iron-adequate groups, PF means control group pair-fed to the iron-deficient group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early pioneer work by Ackman and Sipos [12], and Bannon [13], proposed using a theoretical relative response factor (RRF (Theo) ), based on the ionized carbon atoms, to correct the FID response to FAMEs of different composition. We realized from the previously published results [16][17][18][19][20], and also from our preliminary analysis, that the RRF for different FAMEs can be varied depending upon the GC run conditions, and therefore may cause an error in the determination of fatty acid concentrations in a given sample. The data shown in Fig.…”
Section: Relative Response Factormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The widely used RRF (Theo) was originally calculated based on ''active atom'' theory without considering the instrument conditions [6,14]. However, it has been realized that the instrument parameters, sample running conditions and the fatty acid composition in samples can influence the RRF and hence may affect the analysis [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological samples typically contain a wide variety of molecular species and it has been observed in some studies that, owing to their relative lack of momentum, smaller molecules are more likely to be diverted to waste than larger molecules (Eder, Reichlmayr-Lais, & Kirchgessner, 1991). This phenomenon is known as sample discrimination and a number of strategies have been successfully used to limit its effect on the quality of chromatographic analysis.…”
Section: Chromatographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%