1978
DOI: 10.1021/ac50026a038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas chromatographic determination of dissolved hydrogen and oxygen in photolysis of water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many established methods for the detection of oxygen, which include the Clark electrode [3] and gas chromatography [4], however, such methods are too expensive and time consuming to allow 100% quality assurance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many established methods for the detection of oxygen, which include the Clark electrode [3] and gas chromatography [4], however, such methods are too expensive and time consuming to allow 100% quality assurance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 There are many established methods for the detection and measurement of oxygen, including the Clark electrode, 1 and gas chromatography. 3 However, such systems are usually expensive, both in terms of initial capital outlay and running costs, and so there is increasing interest in inexpensive and disposable sensor technologies, such as that offered by optical sensors. 4 Not surprisingly, the most studied of all the optical sensors are those for oxygen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the reaction mixtures for dissolved hydrogen by gas chromatography showed not even trace amounts of hydrogen were produced. 19 When it is remembered that dissolved 4 could sensitize the reduction of MV2+, that 4 is electroactive and can do redox chemistry, and that 4 adsorbs visible light, it is clear that the failure of the polyquinoline membrane to sensitize the reduction of water is due to the hydrophobicity of the polymer. Undoubtedly, the aqueous relays were not able to diffuse into the polymer to the ruthenium centers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%