1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00113903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas chromatographic determination of peroxyacetyl nitrate: Two convenient calibration techniques

Abstract: Two procedures for the calibration of an electron capture detector (ECD) for peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) are discussed. One is based on the first-order decay rate of the the PAN mixing ratio in conditioned glass storage vessels. The other method makes use of the photochemical generation of PAN in mixtures of acetone and NO z in air. For this purpose a Penray Hg lamp was inserted into a glass vessel filled with 1 atmosphere of air containing 10 ppm NO2 and 1% acetone. After 3 min of irradiation, the average PAN … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…respectively, than those at 10 • C, and the decay rates after the maximum signals were slower at 25 • C than at 10 • C. This phenomenon was contrary to the thermal decomposition behavior of PAN and PPN, but was in good agreement with the results of Meyrahn et al [37] in a glass container and Helmig et al [29] in a Tedlar bag, who explained such phenomena as the strong wall-catalysis/absorption at low temperature. Therefore, the GC-ECD was calibrated in this study via the volatilization of the PAN and PPN solutions for 30 min at 25 • C. The RSD of the GC peak area for PAN from repetitions of volatilization (n = 7) was 10.4% ( 2 ).…”
Section: Preparing Calibration Gaseous Mixturessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…respectively, than those at 10 • C, and the decay rates after the maximum signals were slower at 25 • C than at 10 • C. This phenomenon was contrary to the thermal decomposition behavior of PAN and PPN, but was in good agreement with the results of Meyrahn et al [37] in a glass container and Helmig et al [29] in a Tedlar bag, who explained such phenomena as the strong wall-catalysis/absorption at low temperature. Therefore, the GC-ECD was calibrated in this study via the volatilization of the PAN and PPN solutions for 30 min at 25 • C. The RSD of the GC peak area for PAN from repetitions of volatilization (n = 7) was 10.4% ( 2 ).…”
Section: Preparing Calibration Gaseous Mixturessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The large excess of acetone relative to NO in the mixture favored the complete conversion of NO x to PAN [37]. Both PAN and NO 2 have been verified to be efficiently converted (∼98%) to NO in a molybdenum-containing catalytic converter of NO x analyzer at 325 • C, and can be detected by the NO x analyzer [20].…”
Section: Gc Calibration With In Situ Photochemical Formationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to test the sensitivity of the instrument to peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) interferences, it was prepared by means of the photolysis of acetone and NO in air as described by (Meyrahn et al, 1987) and later by (Warneck and Zerbach, 1992;Flocke et al, 2005). Reactions (R9)-(R13) show the reaction sequence by which PAN is formed by acetone photolysis (Singh et al, 1995).…”
Section: Pan Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peroxyacetyl radicals and PAN were made in the laboratory from the photolysis of acetone in the presence of oxygen and subsequent reaction with N0 2 as implemented by Meyrahn et al (1987). Acetone was carried into a l-L glass bulb by a stream of nitrogen at approximately 12 Lmin-1 .…”
Section: Pan and Ch 1 Co·0mentioning
confidence: 99%