1975
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(75)90559-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas chromatographic determination of thymol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the recommended method is well suited for the assay and evaluation of Thymol in mouth wash preparation and can also be considered as a general method for the quantification of Thymol. In comparison of the other methods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] with FIA procedure, the later is more convenient than the former method because of its speed (sample through-put of 65 injection h −1 ) and wider linear range of the calibration graph. F-and t-test at 95% confidence level [16] showed that there was no significant difference between the proposed method and the standard Bp method during its application to the analysis of mouth washes samples Table (2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, the recommended method is well suited for the assay and evaluation of Thymol in mouth wash preparation and can also be considered as a general method for the quantification of Thymol. In comparison of the other methods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] with FIA procedure, the later is more convenient than the former method because of its speed (sample through-put of 65 injection h −1 ) and wider linear range of the calibration graph. F-and t-test at 95% confidence level [16] showed that there was no significant difference between the proposed method and the standard Bp method during its application to the analysis of mouth washes samples Table (2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used as an antiseptic lotion and mouth wash (1 in 1000) [1]. A number of analytical methods have been reported for the determination of Thymol, these included high pressure liquid chromatography [2][3][4], liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection [5], gas chromatography [6][7][8][9], differential-pulse voltammetry [10], ultraviolet spectrometry [11] and colorimetric analysis [12].…”
Section: Scheme(1): Structure Of Thymolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the recommended method is well suited for the assay and evaluation of Thymol in mouth wash preparation and can also be considered as a general method for the quantification of Thymol. In comparison of the other methods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] with FIA procedure, the later is more convenient than the former method because of its speed (sample through-put of 65 injection h −1 ) and wider linear range of the calibration graph. F-and t-test at 95% confidence level [16] showed that there was no significant difference between the proposed method and the standard…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used as an antiseptic lotion and mouth wash (1 in 1000) [1]. A number of analytical methods have been reported for the determination of Thymol, these included high pressure liquid chromatography [2][3][4], liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection [5], gas chromatography [6][7][8][9], differential-pulse voltammetry [10], ultraviolet spectrometry [11] and colorimetric analysis [12].…”
Section: Scheme(1): Structure Of Thymolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various "high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)" approaches have also been utilized for determining thymol either alone or in combination with other phenolic pharmaceuticals in Unani polyherbal formulations, essential oils, and plant extracts [26][27][28][29]. For the determination of thymol in essential oils, dosage forms, and plant extracts, various "gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry (GC-MS)" technique was used [30][31][32][33]. The determination of thymol in conjunction with eucalyptol, camphor, and menthol in Greek thyme honey was done using a GC-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) method [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%