Gas-dispersed jet flow around a solid in a wide range of stagnation parameters

The particle mass concentration and -mass flow rate are fundamental parameters for describing two-phase flows and are products of particle number, -size, -velocity, and -density. When investigating particle-induced heating augmentation, a detailed knowledge of these parameters is essential. In most of previous experimental studies considering particle-induced heating augmentation, only average particle mass flow rates are given, without any relation to measured particle sizes and -velocities within the flow or any indication of measurement uncertainty. In this work, particle number, individual particle sizes, and velocities were measured in a supersonic flow by means of shadowgraphy and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV). The goals are to determine measurement uncertainties, a particle velocity-size relation, and the spatial distribution of number, size, velocity, and mass flow rate across the nozzle exit. Experiments were conducted in a facility with a nozzle exit diameter of 30 mm, at Ma∞ = 2.1 and Re∞ = 8.2e7 1/m. Particles made of Al2O3 and up to 60 µm in size were used for seeding. Particle mass flow rates up to 50 kg/m2 s were achieved. It is shown that an additional correction procedure reduced common software uncertainties regarding shadowgraphy particle size determination from 14% to less than 6%. Discrepancies between calculated particle velocities and experimental data were found. In terms of spatial distribution, larger particles and a higher mass flow rate concentrate in the flow center. The determined particle mass flow rate uncertainty was up to 50% for PTV; for shadowgraphy, it was less than 17%. Graphical abstract

Simultaneous determination of particle size, velocity, and mass flow in dust-laden supersonic flows

Allofs¹,

Neeb²,

Gülhan³

2022

Particle mass flow determination in dust-laden supersonic flows by means of simultaneous application of optical measurement techniques

Allofs¹,

Neeb²,

Gülhan³

2023

Particle mass flow rate and particle mass concentration are key parameters for describing two-phase flows, especially for particle-induced heating augmentation analysis. This work addresses the question of how accurate particle mass flow rate can be determined with three non-intrusive measurement approaches, based on shadowgraphy, particle tracking velocimetry (PTV), and scattered light intensity, in supersonic flows. In terms of shadowgraphy and PTV, the particle mass flow rate was determined by measuring individual particle characteristics, namely particle size, velocity, and density, as well as the measurement volume. The presented shadowgraphy procedure is based on the commercial LaVision DaVis software and additional shadowgraphy corrections. Multiple tests were conducted in the experimental test facility GBK of DLR with varying flow conditions, at a Mach number of 2.1, unit Reynolds number (Re∞) ranging from 5e7 1/m to 1.5e8 1/m, total temperature (T0) ranging from 303 to 544 K, and particle materials, namely Al2O3, MgO, and SiO2, in the size range of 1 to 60 µm. Particle size distributions of Al2O3 and MgO particles could be reproduced with shadowgraphy quite well, while the PTV procedure resulted in non-similar distributions. Pycnometer measurements indicated MgO particle density to be significantly lower than reference values. A DaVis parameter variation analysis resulted in a particle mass flow rate uncertainty of shadowgraphy of up to 30%. The particle mass flow rate uncertainty of PTV is approx. 76%, and the respective uncertainty of scaled PTV and scattered light intensity approach is 28%. The particle mass flow rate, measured with shadowgraphy, is 58% higher than those of the semi-axisymmetric scattered light intensity approach, which can be explained by a higher particle concentration at the injection plane.

Experimental investigation of heating augmentation by particle kinetic energy conversion in dust-laden supersonic flows

Allofs,

Neeb,

Gülhan

2023

The presence of particles in supersonic flows can cause significant increases in stagnation point heat fluxes (Dunbar et al. in AIAA J 13:908–912, 1975). This effect is commonly named ‘particle-induced heat flux augmentation’ or just ‘heating augmentation.’ Heating augmentation can be described as the sum of the conversion of kinetic energy of the particles into thermal energy, characterized by the energy conversion efficiency, also called accommodation coefficient, and the increase of convective heat flux (Polezhaev et al. in High Temp 30:1147–1153, 1992; Vasilevskii and Osiptsov in Experimental and numerical study of heat transfer on a blunt body in dusty hypersonic flow 33rd thermophysics conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999). Although the accommodation coefficient is fundamental for heating augmentation characterization, there is only a small number of experimental datasets for it. This work focusses on the experimental determination of the accommodation coefficient in flow regimes at Mach number 2.1, Reynolds number, based on the probe nose diameter, from approx. 6e5 to 1.8e6, and nominal particle sizes of approx. 20 µm. The decrease of particle velocity and kinetic energy flux in the shock layer is measured with highly resolved shadowgraphy for individual particles. The particle kinetic energy flux is decreased by 29% on average by particle deceleration in the shock layer. Negligible kinetic energy fluxes of rebounded particles were measured. The accommodation coefficient is approx. 0.36 for Al2O3 and SiO2 particles, while it is approx. 0.09 for MgO particles. Hence, it is significantly smaller than the widely used value of 0.7, based on the study of (Fleener and Watson in Convective heating in dust-laden hypersonic flows 8th thermophysics conference, 1973), but in good agreement with values given in (Hove and Shih in Reentry vehicle stagnation region heat transfer in particle environments 15th aerospace sciences meeting, 1977) and (Molleson and Stasenko in High Temp 55:87–94, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X1701014X ). No difference between erosive and elastic particle reflection mode was detected on the conversion efficiency. The data from a simplification of the modeling approach of the conversion efficiency for elastic particle reflection by Molleson and Stasenko (2017) are in poor agreement with experimental data.