1990
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.115.5.757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas Exchange Characteristics of Apple and Peach Leaves Infested by European Red Mite and Twospotted Spider Mite

Abstract: Greenhouse-grown `Imperial Delicious' apple (Malus domestics Borkh.) and `Redhaven' peach (Prunus persica Batsch.) trees were inoculated during the summer with three densities of European red mite (ERM) (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and twospotted spider mite (TSM) (Tetranychus urticae Koch). As ERM- and TSM-days increased, net photosynthesis (Pn), transpiration (Tr), and total chlorophyll content (TCHL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These comparisons show that T. urticue is a much more harmful pest to the grapevine than P. ulmi. This is in agreement with MOBLEY and MARINI (1990). They found on apple that, at the same mite-load, the photosynthesis reduction caused by T. urticue feeding was twofold that of P. ulmi.…”
Section: Mite-days Per Leafsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These comparisons show that T. urticue is a much more harmful pest to the grapevine than P. ulmi. This is in agreement with MOBLEY and MARINI (1990). They found on apple that, at the same mite-load, the photosynthesis reduction caused by T. urticue feeding was twofold that of P. ulmi.…”
Section: Mite-days Per Leafsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Arrows indicate dates when all 179 trees were sampled and ERM identified to stage. ERM damages apple trees by feeding on the leaves, reducing transpiration, chlorophyll levels, and net photosynthetic rates (Mobley and Marini 1990), resulting in lower production of apples. ERM passes through 3-5 generations per season in the study area (Herbert 1970).…”
Section: Oct Novmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the combination of ubiquity, importance and manageability of ERM compared with the other foliar pests. Some of the reported effects of mites and other foliar feeders on apples are reductions in 1) leaf net CO 2 exchange rates (NCER) (Avery, 1963;Ferree and Hall, 1980;Mobley and Marini, 1990;Welter, 1989); 2) yield due to reduc-tions in fruit size and/or fruit numbers; 3) fruit quality via poor color; reduced sugar concentrations or delayed maturity or earlier fruit abscission; and 4) subsequent year crops due to poor return bloom (Ames et al, 1984;Chapman et al, 1952;Lienk et al, 1956;Lienk and Minns, 1980;Zwick et al, 1976) . The results, however, have been extremely variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%