2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas holdup at dynamic equilibrium region of a bubble column: Effect of bubble generator performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it only works within a limited range, as the proportion of microbubbles introduced into the SBCR increases, the probability of collision between bubbles increases, and the bubbles are more likely to coalesce, causing the bubble size to increase. In extreme cases, it may even cause the gas holdup to collapse, weakening the mass transfer promotion of the microbubbles . Thus, when the microbubble-introducing proportion exceeds a certain value, continuing to increase the microbubbles has little enhancement effect on the liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficient k L a , and the specific values vary depending on the microbubble generator selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it only works within a limited range, as the proportion of microbubbles introduced into the SBCR increases, the probability of collision between bubbles increases, and the bubbles are more likely to coalesce, causing the bubble size to increase. In extreme cases, it may even cause the gas holdup to collapse, weakening the mass transfer promotion of the microbubbles . Thus, when the microbubble-introducing proportion exceeds a certain value, continuing to increase the microbubbles has little enhancement effect on the liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficient k L a , and the specific values vary depending on the microbubble generator selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In extreme cases, it may even cause the gas holdup to collapse, weakening the mass transfer promotion of the microbubbles. 42 Thus, when the microbubble-introducing proportion exceeds a certain value, continuing to increase the microbubbles has little enhancement effect on the liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficient k L a, and the specific values vary depending on the microbubble generator selected. In this experiment, taking SVMG as the microbubble generator, the maximum enhancement ratio of α SVMG to gas−liquid mass transfer is 30%, as shown in Figure 20.…”
Section: Liquid Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the sharp contradiction between high titer products and large-scale 5), ( 6)-( 10), ( 11)-( 15), ( 16)- (20) represents 100, 300, 500, 700 g/L xylose broth with 100/300/500/700/900 rpm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In industry, KL and α are usually combined into one index, the volume transfer coefficient KLα, a significant parameter to simulate the aerobic microorganisms bioprocess' and reactor scale-up 19 . The relationship between α and gas holdup (αg) with fluid/gas volume is given in equations ( 2) and (3) 20 .…”
Section: = ⋅ * −mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in SOS-BR, an intensification strategy for producing XA with high concentration, efficiency, and quality is established by combining theory and practice, breaking through the viscosity limitation in a hypertonic/hyperviscous system. Overall, this intensification strategy provides valuable technical guidance and 5), ( 6)-( 10), ( 11)-( 15), ( 16)- (20) represents 100, 300, 500, 700 g/L xylose broth with 100/300/500/700/900 rpm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%