Gas hydrate dissociation in sediments: Pressure‐temperature evolution

Abstract

[1] Hydrate-bearing sediments may destabilize spontaneously as part of geological processes, unavoidably during petroleum drilling/production operations or intentionally as part of gas extraction from the hydrate itself. In all cases, high pore fluid pressure generation is anticipated during hydrate dissociation. A comprehensive formulation is derived for the prediction of fluid pressure evolution in hydrate-bearing sediments subjected to thermal stimulation without mass transfer. The formulation considers pressure-and temperature-dependent volume changes in all phases, effective stress-controlled sediment compressibility, capillarity, and the relative solubilities of fluids. Salient implications are explored through parametric studies. The model properly reproduces experimental data, including the PT evolution along the phase boundary during dissociation and the effect of capillarity. Pore fluid pressure generation is proportional to the initial hydrate fraction and the sediment bulk stiffness; is inversely proportional to the initial gas fraction and gas solubility; and is limited by changes in effective stress that cause the failure of the sediment. When the sediment stiffness is high, the generated pore pressure reflects thermal and pressure changes in water, hydrate, and mineral densities. Comparative analyses for CO 2 and CH 4 highlight the role of gas solubility in excess pore fluid pressure generation. Dissociation in small pores experiences melting point depression due to changes in water activity, and lower pore fluid pressure generation due to the higher gas pressure in small gas bubbles. Capillarity effects may be disregarded in silts and sands, when hydrates are present in nodules and lenses and when the sediment experiences hydraulic fracture.

Norwegian margin outer shelf cracking: a consequence of climate-induced gas hydrate dissociation?

“…Though such processes cannot be completely ruled out at the moment, it would require complex geomechanical modelling incorporating gas hydrate dissociation which is beyond the scope of this paper. Moreover, there is also very little known about the behaviour of gassy soil in terms of inducing cracks and slope failure conditions due to its complexity (Kwon et al 2008). LGM including ice sheet loading (not to scale) from the Scandinavian mainland to the continental shelf (a) and the PD (b), similar as the situation above.…”

A cylindrical electrical resistivity tomography array for three-dimensional monitoring of hydrate formation and dissociation

“…Kwon et al 11 modelled the P-T evolution along the phase boundary during hydrate dissociation and the effect of capillarity. They found that pore fluid pressure generation is proportional to the initial hydrate fraction and the sediment bulk stiffness but inversely proportional to the initial gas fraction and the gas solubility.…”

Experimental study on mechanical properties of methane-hydrate-bearing sediments

“…There is a concern that hydrocarbon exploration and development activities may trigger hydrate dissociation which may result in seabed slope instability [17][18][19]. Recently, the deepwater horizon explosion in gulf may be caused by dissociation of MH since the drilling rig had reached the sediments where the pressure and temperature is proper for hydrate formation [20,21].…”