2009
DOI: 10.1144/sp319.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas hydrate growth and dissociation in narrow pore networks: capillary inhibition and hysteresis phenomena

Abstract: Marine sediments hosting gas hydrates are commonly fine-grained (silts, muds, clays) with very narrow mean pore diameters ($0.1 mm). This has led to speculation that capillary phenomena could play an important role in controlling hydrate distribution in the seafloor, and may be in part responsible for discrepancies between observed and predicted (from bulk phase equilibria) hydrate stability zone (HSZ) thicknesses. Numerous recent laboratory studies have confirmed a close relationship between hydrate inhibitio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon is implemented in the simulator as a translation of the phase diagram dependent on the effective pore radius of the grid block of interest. The change in methane hydrate freezing temperature is calculated as follows [ Anderson et al ., ]: ΔTm=2Tmbσhlnormalcos|θHfρhre, where T mb is the freezing temperature of methane hydrate in bulk water, σhl is the solid‐liquid interfacial energy between hydrate and water, θ is the hydrate wetting angle to the pore surface, H f is the hydrate bulk enthalpy of fusion, ρ h is the density of methane hydrate, and r e is the effective pore radius describing the change in freezing temperature in a pore of radius r e .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is implemented in the simulator as a translation of the phase diagram dependent on the effective pore radius of the grid block of interest. The change in methane hydrate freezing temperature is calculated as follows [ Anderson et al ., ]: ΔTm=2Tmbσhlnormalcos|θHfρhre, where T mb is the freezing temperature of methane hydrate in bulk water, σhl is the solid‐liquid interfacial energy between hydrate and water, θ is the hydrate wetting angle to the pore surface, H f is the hydrate bulk enthalpy of fusion, ρ h is the density of methane hydrate, and r e is the effective pore radius describing the change in freezing temperature in a pore of radius r e .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, changes in the pore size may change capillary pressures in the sediment. High capillary pressures can cause changes in the temperature/pressure condition (Anderson et al 2009). Because of the uncertainties in quantifying gas hydrates in the study area since the LGM, we neglect capillary pressures and the latent heat inherent to hydrate dissociation due to warming in our modelling.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelling Of Hydrate Stability Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For modeling purposes, the value for the liquidhydrate interfacial tension, the only parameter required for the modeling, was considered to be 0.032 J/m 2 and the shape factor equal to one as it is a function of curvature of hydrateliquid interface. More details about the modeling of gas hydrate growth and dissociation in narrow pores and capillary inhibition effect can be found elsewhere (Anderson et al, 2006;Llamedo et al, 2004).…”
Section: Modeling the Capillary Effect On Hydrate Stability Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%