2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0255-2701(03)00009-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas–liquid–solid flow modelling in a bubble column

Abstract: An alternative approach to the modelling of solid-liquid and gas-liquid-solid flows for a 5:1 height to width aspect ratio bubble column is presented here. A modified transport equation for the volume fraction of a dispersed phase has been developed for the investigation of turbulent buoyancy driven flows [1]. In this study, a modified transport equation has been employed for discrete phase motion considering both solid-liquid and gas-liquid-solid flows. The modelling of the three-phase flow in a bubble column… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, fitting parameters and a uniform bubble diameter had to be used in the calculations; moreover the integral gas holdup prediction could not account for the flow regimes and the axial liquid velocities were systematically underestimated. Glover and Generalis presented a 2D mixture model for simulating the gas–liquid–solid flows in a 5:1 aspect ratio bubble column without considering the interphase forces, and a uniform bubble diameter was used 33. Contours of the mixture velocity vector, gas holdup and solid holdup were predicted by the model with a conclusion that the introduction of a solid phase transport did not disrupt the flow structure of the gas phase compared with the gas–liquid flow, although no experimental validation of the model was done.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, fitting parameters and a uniform bubble diameter had to be used in the calculations; moreover the integral gas holdup prediction could not account for the flow regimes and the axial liquid velocities were systematically underestimated. Glover and Generalis presented a 2D mixture model for simulating the gas–liquid–solid flows in a 5:1 aspect ratio bubble column without considering the interphase forces, and a uniform bubble diameter was used 33. Contours of the mixture velocity vector, gas holdup and solid holdup were predicted by the model with a conclusion that the introduction of a solid phase transport did not disrupt the flow structure of the gas phase compared with the gas–liquid flow, although no experimental validation of the model was done.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%