2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas pooling: A sampling technique to overcome spatial heterogeneity of soil carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide fluxes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No ambient air was injected to correct for the change in pressure associated with the removal of air sample. We used four soil core replicates and pooled the samples as per Arias‐Navarro et al [] for each flux calculation; i.e., a 10 mL gas sample was taken from each individual jar headspace at 15 min intervals (0, 15, 30, and 45 min after chamber closure) with the same syringe at each time interval resulting in a 40 mL composite sample. The first 20 mL of the sample was used to flush a 10 mL glass vial, which was filled with the remaining 20 mL creating overpressure to minimize the risk of contamination by ambient air.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No ambient air was injected to correct for the change in pressure associated with the removal of air sample. We used four soil core replicates and pooled the samples as per Arias‐Navarro et al [] for each flux calculation; i.e., a 10 mL gas sample was taken from each individual jar headspace at 15 min intervals (0, 15, 30, and 45 min after chamber closure) with the same syringe at each time interval resulting in a 40 mL composite sample. The first 20 mL of the sample was used to flush a 10 mL glass vial, which was filled with the remaining 20 mL creating overpressure to minimize the risk of contamination by ambient air.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We removed 10 ml of gas from each chamber immediately upon closure and then after 15, 30 and 45 min. The five gas samples from each of the five chambers were then pooled for analysis as explained by (Arias-Navarro et al, 2013). During gas sampling, soil water content at a depth of 0.05mwasmeasured using a digital Pro-Check sensor (Decagon Devices, Inc. Pullman,WA99163, US),while soil and chamber temperatures were taken with a digital probe thermometer (TFA Dostmann GmbH, Zum Ottersberg, Germany).…”
Section: Gas Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.3 The concept of gas pooling. ( a ) Gas pooling across chambers for a given sampling time, ( b ) gas sample mixing within the syringe, ( c ) transfer of the gas sample to a vial, ( d ) four vials for four sampling times and fi ve chambers, ( e ) air sample analysis via gas chromatography (for further details see Arias-Navarro et al 2013 ) turnover processes due to small-scale differences in soil properties, soil environmental conditions, and microbial activity and diversity. Overcoming spatial variability effects on GHG fl uxes is a major challenge, specifi cally for highly diverse smallholder systems.…”
Section: Chambers and Spatial Variability Of Ghg Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%