2019
DOI: 10.1080/10736700.2019.1627776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas, power, and norms: competing logics for the declining use of chemical warfare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rationalist explanations primarily focus on the limited military utility of chemical agents and the logic of mutual deterrence (Ellis and Moon, 1984; Krause, 1991; Martin, 2004a; Martin, 2016; Chapman, Elbahtimy and Martin, 2018; Allison and Herzog, 2019). In contrast, genealogical explanations highlight the gradual emergence and institutionalization of the international norm against chemical weapon-use in world politics (Price, 1995, 1997; Bentley, 2013, 2014; Jefferson, 2014; Kovačević, Afrimadona and Claar, 2019). Finally, the “essentialist” explanations put forward arguments about the deep-rooted aversion of humans to toxic substances, supposedly encoded in our genetic and psychological make-up (Mandelbaum, 1981: chap.…”
Section: Nuclear and Chemical “Taboos” In A Comparative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rationalist explanations primarily focus on the limited military utility of chemical agents and the logic of mutual deterrence (Ellis and Moon, 1984; Krause, 1991; Martin, 2004a; Martin, 2016; Chapman, Elbahtimy and Martin, 2018; Allison and Herzog, 2019). In contrast, genealogical explanations highlight the gradual emergence and institutionalization of the international norm against chemical weapon-use in world politics (Price, 1995, 1997; Bentley, 2013, 2014; Jefferson, 2014; Kovačević, Afrimadona and Claar, 2019). Finally, the “essentialist” explanations put forward arguments about the deep-rooted aversion of humans to toxic substances, supposedly encoded in our genetic and psychological make-up (Mandelbaum, 1981: chap.…”
Section: Nuclear and Chemical “Taboos” In A Comparative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 6 7 ] In the Vietnam War in 1960s and the early years of 1970s, the Americans inflicted irreparable damages to Vietnam rangelands, forests, and the environment as well as its people through the use of hazardous chemical agents, especially Agent Orange, that despite major restoration plans, its ominous effects were not resolved after decades later. [ 8 9 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%