2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(01)00299-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas transport in bisphenol A poly(ether ether ketone ketone) membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robeson plots for CO 2 /N 2 , CO 2 /CH 4 , and O 2 /N 2 separations, compared with neutral PEEK/PEKK derivatives. Note that referenced data were reported in the range of P = 2–3 atm and T = 25–35 °C, and O 2 data were not reported for most of the ionic polymers represented here. ,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Robeson plots for CO 2 /N 2 , CO 2 /CH 4 , and O 2 /N 2 separations, compared with neutral PEEK/PEKK derivatives. Note that referenced data were reported in the range of P = 2–3 atm and T = 25–35 °C, and O 2 data were not reported for most of the ionic polymers represented here. ,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postsynthetic modification of PEEK is typically performed via sulfonation (e.g., “S-PEEK”, Figure c) or nitration (e.g., “N-PEEK”, Figure d) with corresponding strong acids that yields anionic, hydrophilic, and polyelectrolyte forms of PEEK that are primarily used as H + -conducting membranes for fuel cell applications. While “pure” PEEK is semicrystalline and thus membranes show very low gas and liquid transport rates, a handful of studies have explored the properties of modified PEEK materials as membranes for either gas or liquid separations. Experimental and computational , studies have examined the gas transport or solvent separation behaviors through neutral, substituted, fluorinated, or sulfonated PEEK membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(PC: D ( T = 23 °C, p = 0.1 MPa) = 8.1 × 10 –13 m 2 /s, Δ E d = 41 kJ/mol . PEEK: D ( T = 23 °C, p = 0.1 MPa) = 3.4 × 10 –13 m 2 /s, Δ E d = 17 kJ/mol). In Figure , depending on the actual temperature at c, the decrease in concentration at d–e was estimated to be 6–10% for PC and 3–7% for PEEK.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the loss of N 2 between the initial release of pressure and the decrease in temperature and the time of weighing, eq 3 was used, together with literature data. 33 ). In Figure 9, depending on the actual temperature at c, the decrease in concentration at d−e was estimated to be 6−10% for PC and 3−7% for PEEK.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation