2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781108241625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas Turbines for Electric Power Generation

Abstract: gas-fired power plants in the USA in 2015 was about 46 percent, vis-à-vis about 33 percent for all coal-fired plants (as reported by the US Energy Information Administration [EIA]). Furthermore, in terms of specific CO 2 emissions (i.e., pounds of CO 2 emitted per MWh of electricity generated), coal-fired generation is by far the worst culprit, at nearly 150 percent more than that by natural gas-fired generation (again, in 2015 per the EIA).In 2015, natural gas and coal each accounted for about a third of all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, the GSC-AF plant offers some additional benefits because it is the least capital intensive, and, under part-load operation, it will reduce the fraction of fuel input required from more expensive natural gas. For example, when the F-class gas turbine output reduces by a little more than 50%, the TIT falls to the GSC outlet temperature [38], thus requiring no more natural gas firing. Under these conditions, the plant can operate with only a mild turndown of the relatively inflexible gasification train, but a substantial turndown in overall plant output, saving the high natural gas fuel costs and associated CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, the GSC-AF plant offers some additional benefits because it is the least capital intensive, and, under part-load operation, it will reduce the fraction of fuel input required from more expensive natural gas. For example, when the F-class gas turbine output reduces by a little more than 50%, the TIT falls to the GSC outlet temperature [38], thus requiring no more natural gas firing. Under these conditions, the plant can operate with only a mild turndown of the relatively inflexible gasification train, but a substantial turndown in overall plant output, saving the high natural gas fuel costs and associated CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the conceptual design of H 2 -power processes at a low technology readiness level (TLR) and the current state of development, requiring tailor-made turbomachinery components to reach attractive efficiencies, the simplified approach is considered reasonable. Indeed, the reference gas turbines are taken from combined cycle applications [41,51], whose heat rate is substantially above the natural gas heat input to the plants presented in this study.…”
Section: Gspox H 2 -Power Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane for H2 separation with some water gas shift catalyst to carry out the CO conversion simultaneously is extensively studied in detail with the aim of boosting the efficiency of plants with chemical looping plants, which are limited by low reactor temperatures. Also, a set of benchmark models (with and without CCS) using highly efficiency H-class turbines [28] and HGCU were developed. These issues will be presented in more detail in Chapter 4.…”
Section: Overview Of Igcc Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard F-class turbine described in [6] is the baseline for the topping power cycle performance of the introductory plants. A natural gas fired model was calibrated in Unisim to meet the specifications of this turbomachine, which are described in Table 31 and are consistent for advanced turbine technology parameters given in [28]. The process model flow diagram used for the GT is depicted in Figure 75.…”
Section: F-class Gas Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation