2014
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaseous Mean Opacities for Giant Planet and Ultracool Dwarf Atmospheres Over a Range of Metallicities and Temperatures

Abstract: We present new calculations of Rosseland and Planck gaseous mean opacities relevant to the atmospheres of giant planets and ultracool dwarfs. Such calculations are used in modeling the atmospheres, interiors, formation, and evolution of these objects. Our calculations are an expansion of those presented in to include lower pressures, finer temperature resolution, and also the higher metallicities most relevant for giant planet atmospheres. Calculations span 1 µbar to 300 bar, and 75 K to 4000 K, in a nearly s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
356
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
6
356
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At P ≈ 100 bar and T ≈ 1000 K the fit systematically underestimate the Rosseland mean opacities by ≈ 30−50% (see Fig. 8 of Freedman et al 2014). This underestimation of the Rosseland mean opacity directly translates to an underestimation of the radiative gradient and to the appearance of a spurious deep radiative zone and a bias in our estimate of P R/C .…”
Section: Radiative/convective Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At P ≈ 100 bar and T ≈ 1000 K the fit systematically underestimate the Rosseland mean opacities by ≈ 30−50% (see Fig. 8 of Freedman et al 2014). This underestimation of the Rosseland mean opacity directly translates to an underestimation of the radiative gradient and to the appearance of a spurious deep radiative zone and a bias in our estimate of P R/C .…”
Section: Radiative/convective Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This reflects the sensitivity of the deep atmospheric structure to the Rosseland mean opacities calculations. As shown by Freedman et al (2014), a variation of ≈10-50% is common between different calculations of the Rosseland mean opacities.…”
Section: Radiative/convective Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Given the temperature-pressure profile of the atmosphere and the elemental abundances parametrized with metallicity, [M/H], and C/O, the model first computes the thermochemical equilibrium molecular mixing ratios (and mean molecular weight) using the publicly available Chemical Equilibrium with Applications code (CEA, McBride & Gordon (1996)) 2 . The thermochemically derived opacity relevant mixing ratio profiles (H 2 O, CH 4 , CO, CO 2 , NH 3 , H 2 S, C 2 H 2 , HCN, TiO, VO, Na, K, FeH, H 2 , He), temperature profile, cloud and haze proprieties, and planet bulk parameters (10 bar radius, stellar radius, planetary gravity) are then fed into a transit transmission spectrum model (Line et al (2013b); Greene et al (2016); Line & Parmentier (2016), using the Freedman et al (2008Freedman et al ( , 2014 opacity database) to compute the wavelength-dependent eclipse depth at the appropriate instrument spectral resolving power. For cloudy simulations, we assume a hard gray cloud top pressure set to be at the 1 mbar pressure level, below which the transmittance is set to zero and use the "Rayleigh Haze" power law parameterization (Lecavelier Des Etangs et al 2008) to describe hazes.…”
Section: Transit Transmission Spectra Models and Their Jacobiansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When computing the spectra for two TP profiles, we assume the day-side abundances for both, consistent with expectations from horizontal mixing (e.g., Cooper & Showman 2006;Agúndez et al 2014). The opacity database is described in Freedman et al (2014).…”
Section: Modeling Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%