Experimental models showed consistently a modulation of carcinogenesis by omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (v3 PUFA). Fish intake is often described as part of a beneficial dietary pattern. However, observational epidemiological studies on the relationship between v3 PUFA reported conflicting results. The objective of this systematic review is to determine whether there exists any progress in the evaluation of the causal relationship between dietary v3 PUFA and cancers since the previous FAO/OMS expert consultation and whether it is possible to propose preventive and/or adjuvant therapeutic recommendations. Prospective and case-control observational studies published since 2007 and meeting validity criteria were considered together with RCT. Experimental studies are mentioned to provide for biological plausibility. When evaluating the level of evidence, a portfolio approach was used, weighted by a hierarchy giving higher importance to prospective studies followed by RCT if any. There is a probable level of evidence that ALA per se is neither a risk factor nor a beneficial factor with regards to cancers. Observational studies on colorectal, prostate and breast cancers only provided limited evidence suggesting a possible role of LC-v3PUFA in cancer prevention because insufficient homogeneity of the observations. Explanation for heterogeneity might be the inherent difficulties associated with epidemiology (confounding and dietary pattern context, measurement error, level of intake, genetic polymorphism). The role of LC-v3PUFA as adjuvant, might be considered of possible use, in view of the latest RCT on lung cancers even if RCT on other cancers still need to be undertaken.Key words: Omega 3 fatty acids: EPA: DHA: alpha linolenic acid: cancers: epidemiologic studies Rationale: The incidence of cancers affected almost 13 million people and caused more than 7 million deaths worldwide in 2008. Incidence is expected to increase to 15 million in 2015 and death to more than 9 million due to demographic effects alone. However increased longevity is not the only explanation, e.g. in France the incidence of cancers in males increased by 35 % and in females by 43 % after controlling for the demographic effect (1) Thus it is generally acknowledged that changes in exposure to carcinogenic environment and in nutrition are factors of this evolution.If changes in food patterns are more often associated with an increased incidence of cancers, as illustrated in migrant studies (2) , it happens that nutritional recommendations are followed by a decreased incidence (3) . This underlines the search for beneficial nutrients. Several epidemiological studies have shown a risk reduction of some cancers associated with long chain omega3 fatty acids (v3 LC-PUFA) or fish intake (4) , but the limited evidence or the absence of consistency required further investigations.A systematic review of the epidemiological studies published since 2007 is undertaken here focusing on v3 LC-PUFA either from dietary intake (but not considering fis...