2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastric cancer with synchronous and metachronous hepatic metastasis predicted by enhancement pattern on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e analysis of the rehabilitation effect of the patients showed that the number of CR (5 cases), PR (13 cases), RR (18 cases), and DCR (44 cases) in the experimental group was significantly more than that in the control group, while the number of PD (12 cases) was significantly less than that in the control group (P < 0.05). It suggested that the PTX combined with decitabine sequential decitabine maintenance treatment program was better than the decitabine combined with cisplatin first-line treatment program for patients with advanced gastric cancer [25]. From the side effects of patients, the number of patients with hematological toxicity, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal reactions after treatment in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group (P < 0.05), which proved that PTX combined with decitabine sequential decitabine maintenance therapy had the advantage of less toxic side effects, which advanced gastric cancer can tolerate [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e analysis of the rehabilitation effect of the patients showed that the number of CR (5 cases), PR (13 cases), RR (18 cases), and DCR (44 cases) in the experimental group was significantly more than that in the control group, while the number of PD (12 cases) was significantly less than that in the control group (P < 0.05). It suggested that the PTX combined with decitabine sequential decitabine maintenance treatment program was better than the decitabine combined with cisplatin first-line treatment program for patients with advanced gastric cancer [25]. From the side effects of patients, the number of patients with hematological toxicity, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal reactions after treatment in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group (P < 0.05), which proved that PTX combined with decitabine sequential decitabine maintenance therapy had the advantage of less toxic side effects, which advanced gastric cancer can tolerate [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CS may not be suitable for some patients who have liver metastasis before initial treatment. Tsurumaru et al reported that tiny lesions or microscopic metastases are not detectable even with the use of high‐resolution imaging 21 . Shirasu et al reported that the indications for hepatectomy for multiple liver metastases remain unclear 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsurumaru et al reported that tiny lesions or microscopic metastases are not detectable even with the use of high‐resolution imaging. 21 Shirasu et al reported that the indications for hepatectomy for multiple liver metastases remain unclear. 22 We also found that liver metastases were associated with VER.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have reported that tumor percent enhancement could help in evaluating the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, 24 distinguishing the histological type of GC, 25 predicting synchronous and metachronous hepatic metastasis in GC, 26 and determining LNM of rectal cancer. 19 , 27 These studies revealed that enhancement features of tumors play an essential role in assessing tumor prognosis and clinical stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%