2012
DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2012.18.2.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis

Abstract: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for gastroparesis has been in use for more than a decade. Multiple publications, consisting almost entirely of open label single center studies, reported a beneficial effect on symptoms, quality of life and nutritional status. Some predictors of better response to GES have been lately identified, primarily diabetic etiology and nausea and vomiting as the predominant symptoms. However, individual response to GES remains difficult to predict. The mechanism of action of GES re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters can entrain slow waves, reverse dysrhythmias, and, hence, accelerate gastric emptying. [10][11][12][13] (2) On the other hand, short-pulse low-energy GES at frequencies higher than physiologic is termed neurostimulation, and may alleviate gastroparetic symptoms, specifically nausea and vomiting, without a meaningful improvement in gastric emptying or changing the underlying slow-wave rhythm pattern. 14,15 Hence, the predicted outcome or goals of GES depend on the parameters of the applied stimulation (Fig.…”
Section: Different Methods Of Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These parameters can entrain slow waves, reverse dysrhythmias, and, hence, accelerate gastric emptying. [10][11][12][13] (2) On the other hand, short-pulse low-energy GES at frequencies higher than physiologic is termed neurostimulation, and may alleviate gastroparetic symptoms, specifically nausea and vomiting, without a meaningful improvement in gastric emptying or changing the underlying slow-wave rhythm pattern. 14,15 Hence, the predicted outcome or goals of GES depend on the parameters of the applied stimulation (Fig.…”
Section: Different Methods Of Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increasing knowledge of gastric electrophysiology inspired, in the late 1990s, a group of scientists and clinicians, such as Qian, Kelly, McCallum, Morison and Familoni, to pursue the potential therapeutic role of gastric pacing and normalization of myoelectrical dysrhythmia. [10][11][12][13] …”
Section: History Of Gastric Electrical Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pulse generator is typically implanted under the skin in the upper right or left quadrant of the abdomen, but many locations on the anterior abdominal may be used . Leads extend from the pulse generator to the electrodes, which are implanted in the muscularis propria of the greater curvature of the stomach . An external programming device is used to control the stimulation parameters .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, an individual's response to temporary GES remains unpredictable. 11 The authors indicated that temporary GES improved nausea, vomiting, and total symptom scores without accelerating gastric emptying. However, they did not consider abdominal pain, another common symptom of gastroparesis, as a parameter after insertion of the temporary GES electrode pair and neurostimulator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%