2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastric emptying in healthy newborns fed an intact protein formula, a partially and an extensively hydrolysed formula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For all previous simulations, variability ranges for CL, GET, and SITT were assigned to account for the interindividual variability. These values were either set by the software, as in software 1—CL: mean value ± 30% CV; GET: mean value ± 38% CV; SITT: Weibull distribution around the mean value with α  = 2.92 and β  = 4.04; or were assigned manually based on a comprehensive literature search as in software 2: lognormal distribution with geometric standard deviation of 1.3 for CL, GET: uniform distribution of 0.2–1.9 h in adults (49,50) and 0.2–2.1 h in children (51–54), and SITT: normal distribution with a mean value of 4 ± 1 h in both (49,55). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all previous simulations, variability ranges for CL, GET, and SITT were assigned to account for the interindividual variability. These values were either set by the software, as in software 1—CL: mean value ± 30% CV; GET: mean value ± 38% CV; SITT: Weibull distribution around the mean value with α  = 2.92 and β  = 4.04; or were assigned manually based on a comprehensive literature search as in software 2: lognormal distribution with geometric standard deviation of 1.3 for CL, GET: uniform distribution of 0.2–1.9 h in adults (49,50) and 0.2–2.1 h in children (51–54), and SITT: normal distribution with a mean value of 4 ± 1 h in both (49,55). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A doubleblind, randomized, crossover study compared gastric emptying in 20 healthy newborns fed CM-SF, pHF and eHF containing 50 ml 13 C-octanoic acid. eHF resulted in significantly faster gastric emptying than SF and pHF (medians 46 vs. 55 and 53 min, respectively) [45] .…”
Section: Treatment Of Allergymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Use of hydrolysed, compared to intact protein, in formula-fed term [82] and preterm infants [83,84] has been shown to accelerate gastrointestinal transit time [83] and to accelerate feeding advancement [84]. The degree to which the protein is hydrolysed may moderate the rate of gastric emptying with increased rates demonstrated with use of extensively, rather than partially, hydrolysed formula [82]. It is unclear whether utilization of the hydrolysed protein is compromised by the tendency towards higher frequency of stools that appear to be generated through its use [83].…”
Section: Hydrolysed Vs Intact Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%