2013
DOI: 10.1179/2046905513y.0000000103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastric lavage for prevention of feeding problems in neonates with meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Gastric lavage in newborns with meconium-stained amniotic fluid does not prevent or reduce the occurrence of feeding problems or secondary meconium aspiration syndrome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a large RCT study done at our center in vigorous babies with MSAF, no difference in the incidence of feeding problems or secondary MAS was observed between the lavage and nonlavage group. 49 Similar results have been shown in other trials with no clear demonstrable benefits of this practice. 50,51 Most of these studies have included only vigorous neonates who might not have had prolonged meconium exposure in utero.…”
Section: Nasogastric Aspirationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, in a large RCT study done at our center in vigorous babies with MSAF, no difference in the incidence of feeding problems or secondary MAS was observed between the lavage and nonlavage group. 49 Similar results have been shown in other trials with no clear demonstrable benefits of this practice. 50,51 Most of these studies have included only vigorous neonates who might not have had prolonged meconium exposure in utero.…”
Section: Nasogastric Aspirationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Sharma et al :17 This was a single-centre RCT from India. Neonates >34 weeks were randomised to undergo GL or no intervention immediately after delivery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 14 17 18 Only 2/6 (33%) were considered to have low risk of bias for ‘allocation concealment’ 13 17. For the domain of ‘blinding of participants and personnel’, 3/6 (50%) carried low ROB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distensi abdomen pada BBLR yang mengalami intoleransi pemberian minum enteral disebabkan oleh gangguan pada proses perjalanan mekonium dan penurunan bising usus (Sharma et al, 2013). Posisi pronasi meningkatkan pertukaran gas dengan menurunkan tekanan pleura dan meningkatkan area ventilasi rongga diafragma, sehingga dapat menurunkan distensi abdomen.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified