2008
DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0b013e31803238b3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastric Perforation With an Associated Subhepatic Liver Abscess Related to an Accidentally Ingested Lobster Shell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ingested foreign bodies vary from countries and depend on dietary habits. Reported foreign bodies include metallic or plastic objects such as needle, [32] coin, [87,91] metallic wire, [28] pen, [10] dental plate, [86] and toothbrush; [57] organic objects such as animal bones (fish [8] chicken, [18] and rabbit [88] ), or shell; [82] wooden objects such as toothpick, [29] clothespin [12] or some plan, [14] and other objects. With regard to penetrated foreign bodies, objects that cause perforation are usually sharp, pointed, or elongated, yet all of the aforementioned foreign bodies have been reported for penetration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingested foreign bodies vary from countries and depend on dietary habits. Reported foreign bodies include metallic or plastic objects such as needle, [32] coin, [87,91] metallic wire, [28] pen, [10] dental plate, [86] and toothbrush; [57] organic objects such as animal bones (fish [8] chicken, [18] and rabbit [88] ), or shell; [82] wooden objects such as toothpick, [29] clothespin [12] or some plan, [14] and other objects. With regard to penetrated foreign bodies, objects that cause perforation are usually sharp, pointed, or elongated, yet all of the aforementioned foreign bodies have been reported for penetration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish bones are particularly problematic in unintentional ingestions and are reported as causative factors in complications from ingestions in up to 63% of cases . While the ingestion of crustacean claws is less frequent (any ingestion of a crustacean fragment is reported in less than 20% of unintentional ingestions), the presentation can be quite dramatic, perhaps because of the cutting function of the claw . Regardless of the type of foreign body ingestion, the ileocecal region tends to be the most common site of perforation (30%-39%), presumably because it represents an anatomic site of narrowing where foreign bodies can become lodged and erode through the bowel wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 While the ingestion of crustacean claws is less frequent (any ingestion of a crustacean fragment is reported in less than 20% of unintentional ingestions), 2,3 the presentation can be quite dramatic, perhaps because of the cutting function of the claw. 6,7 Regardless of the type of foreign body ingestion, the ileocecal region tends to be the most common site of perforation (30%-39%), [1][2][3] presumably because it represents an anatomic site of narrowing where foreign bodies can become lodged and erodethrough the bowel wall. We suspect adhesions from this patient's appendectomy contributed to perforation in this area for him.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%