2021
DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s335985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrin-17 Combined with CEA, CA12-5 and CA19-9 Improves the Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al (2021) evaluated the effectiveness of combining gastrin-17 with CEA, CA12-5, and CA19-9 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. The results showed a sensitivity of four indicators for diagnosing gastric cancer less than 25%, which suggests that they do not meet the necessary standards for clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2021) evaluated the effectiveness of combining gastrin-17 with CEA, CA12-5, and CA19-9 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. The results showed a sensitivity of four indicators for diagnosing gastric cancer less than 25%, which suggests that they do not meet the necessary standards for clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many clinical studies of gynecologic malignancies incorporated CA125 as a serum marker that indicates tumorigenesis and metastasis [ 16 , 17 ]. As an easily accessible clinical examination, CA125 also played a key role in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal malignant tumors [ 18 , 19 ]. Studies have shown that CA125 level was a predictive factor of peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer [ 20 , 21 ] and normalization of CA125 was relevant with better survival [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in northeastern and southern China showed that the sensitivity of CEA in the diagnosis of GC was 49.6% and 34.78%, respectively, and that of CA19-9 was 49.6% and 52.61%, respectively. 31,32 We consider that the difference in sensitivity and predictive performance of TMs in different regions may be affected by diet. 33 The dietary habits of Northeast China and South China are different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%