1977
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/136.2.239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastroenteritis in Children: A Two-Year Review in Manitoba. I. Etiology

Abstract: During two years, 1,217 children hospitalized with gastroenteritis at the Children's Centre in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada were studied. Bacterial pathogens were present in 25% of these children: enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in 120, Shigella in 139, Salmonella in 24, and multiple pathogens in 18. Rotavirus was detected in 54 (11%) of 472 patients examined. Rotavirus and enteropathogenic E. coli were the most common pathogens in infants, and Shigella was the most common in older children. Bacterial diarrhea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
4

Year Published

1981
1981
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
33
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of Boston children suggested that ETEC were unimportant (Echeverria, Blacklow & Smith, 1975) and studies in Canada reached the same conclusion (Gurwith & Williams, 1977). In Europe a Swedish study and a small survey in Britain found that ETEC were uncommon as a cause of indigenous sporadic diarrhoea in those countries (Back, Blomberg & Wadstrom, 1977;Gross, Scotland & Rowe, 1979) and ETEC were not found in a Swiss study of 119 adults with diarrhoea (Loosli et al 1985).…”
Section: Diarrhoea In the Community In Developed Countriesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study of Boston children suggested that ETEC were unimportant (Echeverria, Blacklow & Smith, 1975) and studies in Canada reached the same conclusion (Gurwith & Williams, 1977). In Europe a Swedish study and a small survey in Britain found that ETEC were uncommon as a cause of indigenous sporadic diarrhoea in those countries (Back, Blomberg & Wadstrom, 1977;Gross, Scotland & Rowe, 1979) and ETEC were not found in a Swiss study of 119 adults with diarrhoea (Loosli et al 1985).…”
Section: Diarrhoea In the Community In Developed Countriesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although outbreaks of EPEC enteritis now appear to be uncommon in temperate areas with good standards of hygiene, it has been shown that EPEC are still a common cause of enteritis in tropical countries (Maiya et al 1977) and among communities with poor standards of hygiene (Gurwith & Williams, 1977). The epidemiology of EPEC enteritis in tropical countries differs from that in Europe and North America in that although outbreaks in institutions are often reported in the tropics, sporadic cases and outbreaks occur more frequently in the community.…”
Section: Infantile Enteropathogenic E Coli (Epec) Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identified contribution of bacteria in this study of 19.4% for CAD and 23.3% for NAD is in the higher end of the documented rates of bacterial diarrheas in children of developed countries, which have ranged from 5.1% to 31% (6,(8)(9)(10)12,21,27,33,36,(42)(43)(44). Bacterial culture was positive in 10.6% CAD specimens, with E coli identified as the most common non-C difficile bacteria, present in 3% of CAD episodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Knowledge of etiological agents of infectious diarrhea at a particular institution may help to determine focused empirical therapy and to choose the appropriate stool tests, possibly reducing the cost of hospitalization without affecting patient care. Previous studies in other localities have documented significant site to site differences with respect to the types of pathogens causing paediatric infectious diarrhea (5-12), but have not clearly differentiated community-acquired diarrhea (CAD) from nosocomial diarrhea (NAD) (5)(6)(7)9,11). A wide range of viral, bacterial and parasitic causes of infectious diarrhea are now recognized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enterotoxin production of Aeromonas strains was measured by the suckling mouse test (10). Filtered supernatants (100 l) of the respective bacterial cultures were administered into the stomachs of 3-to 5-day-old mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%