2019
DOI: 10.1111/ans.15405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastroepiploic artery pseudoaneurysm: a rare cause of abdominal pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the rarity of GEAA [3], the estimation of true Gastroepiploic Artery Pseudoaneurysms (GEAP) has been performed retrospectively and, in a few cases, found that 50% of GEAA are actually GEAP [2]. Abdominal trauma with intimal injury and weakening of the vascular wall has been proposed as the main etiological factor of these pseudoaneurysms [5]. Other causes such as the enzymatic proteolytic effect in chronic pancreatitis, chronic cholecystitis, infectious causes (abscesses), iatrogenic surgical trauma or percutaneous biliary intervention, systemic vasculitis, segmental arterial mediolysis, and malignancy have been reported [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Given the rarity of GEAA [3], the estimation of true Gastroepiploic Artery Pseudoaneurysms (GEAP) has been performed retrospectively and, in a few cases, found that 50% of GEAA are actually GEAP [2]. Abdominal trauma with intimal injury and weakening of the vascular wall has been proposed as the main etiological factor of these pseudoaneurysms [5]. Other causes such as the enzymatic proteolytic effect in chronic pancreatitis, chronic cholecystitis, infectious causes (abscesses), iatrogenic surgical trauma or percutaneous biliary intervention, systemic vasculitis, segmental arterial mediolysis, and malignancy have been reported [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance angiography is another option; however, it is limited by the decrease in contrast resolution, long acquisition times, lower availability, and higher costs. It may be an option in stable patients who tolerate the procedure and seek radiation limitation [4,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations