Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Dental Erosion (DE)

Halaby, Hanaa; Thomson, Mike

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11202-7_106

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…gastric acid) 2,3 . Common causes for the presence of the gastric acid in the oral cavity include gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), bulimia nervosa, eating disorders, chronic vomiting, and persistent regurgitation and rumination 4,5 . Demineralization of enamel will occur once the oral environmental pH reaches the critical threshold of 5.5 for both erosion and caries development 6 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Simulated Gastric Acid on Surface Roughness of Different Types of Dental Ceramics

eltorky

Shakal

Elshahawy

et al. 2021

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of simulated gastric acidity on surface roughness of different types of dental ceramics. Methods: Fifty specimens were divided according to type of the material into five groups (n=10), as follows: Partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ) (Prettaue), Fully stabilized zirconia (FSZ) (Prettaue Anterior), lithium disilicate ceramics (IPS. Emax), Zirconia-containing lithium silicate ceramics (ZLS) (Vita Suprinity) and Hybrid ceramics (Vita Enamic). Specimens were cut using a low-speed diamond saw (Isomet) into a rectangular shape with the following dimension: 12mm width x 14mm length x 1 mm thickness. Surface roughness was evaluated by optical profilometer. Each specimen was immersed in 5 ml of the simulated acid of ph 1.2 for 96 h in a37˚C incubator. Surface roughness of all tested groups was revaluated. One-way ANOVA was used to compare mean difference between groups. Paired t-test was used for comparing (before and after) roughness in each group. Results: There was significant difference (P=0.002) between all groups. There was increase in surface roughness for all materials tested, but it was non-significant (P>0.05) for Prettaue (P=0.607), Prettaue Anterior (P=0.273) and Vita Suprinty group (P=0.201). There was significant increase (P≤0. 05) for IPS. Emax group (P=0.007) and Vita Enamic groups (P=0.021). Prettaue Anterior group showed the least amount of surface roughness change (0.0006±0.002), while Vita Enamic group showed the highest surface roughness change (0.0100±0.011). Conclusions: The gastric acid significantly increased the surface roughness of hybrid ceramics and lithium disilicate ceramics.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%