1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)32085-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrointestinal Alterations in Protein-Calorie Malnutrition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They explained their finding by a defect in receptive relaxation of the stomach due to visceral neuropathy secondary to malnutrition (Clarke and Alexander-Williams, 1973) as well as reduced ganglion plexuses in the intestine (Viteri and Schneider, 1974). These results are in disagreement with the present study, yet the studies showing reduced ganglion plexuses in the intestine did not discuss the intrinsic stomach innervations and thus should not be relied upon in explaining the delayed GET.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They explained their finding by a defect in receptive relaxation of the stomach due to visceral neuropathy secondary to malnutrition (Clarke and Alexander-Williams, 1973) as well as reduced ganglion plexuses in the intestine (Viteri and Schneider, 1974). These results are in disagreement with the present study, yet the studies showing reduced ganglion plexuses in the intestine did not discuss the intrinsic stomach innervations and thus should not be relied upon in explaining the delayed GET.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The stomach shows mucosal atrophy with decreased acid secretion (Adesola, 1968;Gracey et al, 1977). In addition, Viteri and Schneider (1974) had reported that gastric dilatation is frequently observed among children with PEM, suggesting that stomach motility is affected. Studies describing delayed GET in children with PEM are few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mucosa thickness decreased in G3 animals compared to G1 animals (p<0.05), which has also been observed in other studies (Viteri and Schneider 1974, Rodrigues et al 1985, Da CostaRibeiro et al 1987, Torrejais et al 1995, Natali et al 2000, Schoffen et al 2005, De Azevedo et al 2007, Hermes et al 2008. Conversely, the mucosa was less reduced in G4 (7.4%) than in G3 (13.5%) compared to well-nourished G1 animals (p<0.05), as illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Probiotics Protect the Jejunum Of Malnourished Ratsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, it was verified that the mucosa thickness presented gain deficit in protein malnourished animals (G3) when compared to eutrophic ones (G1) that were not supplemented with probiotics (p<0.05). On the other hand, the supplementation with probiotics (G4) provided a protective effect to the mucosa; this damage is generally observed in protein malnourishment (Viteri and Schneider 1974, Rodrigues et al 1985, Torrejais et al 1995, Natali et al 2000, Schoffen et al 2005, De Azevedo et al 2007, Hermes et al 2008. It is important to point out that the eutrophic animals were also supplemented with probiotics (G2) and presented thicknening of the mucosa when compared to G1, corroborating the studies that describe the proliferative effect induced by these microorganisms (Dock et al 2004a, AguilarNascimento et al 2006, Ng et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%