Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4160-4867-1.00012-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrointestinal Tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the patient is fasted for at least 12 h, feces and gas may fill only the colon, but they can be present also in the small intestine, creating reverberation artifacts and acoustic shadowing making wall measurements difficult (Penninck, 1998;Larson and Billler 2009). In the small intestine, the same layering of the stomach is observed (see above); colonic wall has a layered appearance like the small intestine but is thinner with less obvious layering; it can be easily identified because of its location and striking acoustic shadow and reverberation artifacts (Nyland et al, 2016). Normal small bowel wall thickness ranges approximately from 2 to 5 mm; large bowel thickness, instead, ranges from 1 to 2,5 mm (Riedesel, 2017).…”
Section: Intestinementioning
confidence: 75%
“…If the patient is fasted for at least 12 h, feces and gas may fill only the colon, but they can be present also in the small intestine, creating reverberation artifacts and acoustic shadowing making wall measurements difficult (Penninck, 1998;Larson and Billler 2009). In the small intestine, the same layering of the stomach is observed (see above); colonic wall has a layered appearance like the small intestine but is thinner with less obvious layering; it can be easily identified because of its location and striking acoustic shadow and reverberation artifacts (Nyland et al, 2016). Normal small bowel wall thickness ranges approximately from 2 to 5 mm; large bowel thickness, instead, ranges from 1 to 2,5 mm (Riedesel, 2017).…”
Section: Intestinementioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, changes are frequently present and typically take the form of mild diffuse thickening of the intestinal wall with preservation of layering and/or thicken ing of individual wall layers. 1 Hypoechoic nodules 1–3 mm in diameter have been reported in the submucosa of the colonic wall that are thought to represent reactive intraparietal lymphoid follicles and may indicate the presence of colonic inflammatory disease (Figure l). 2…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Wall Thickening: Diffuse Vs Focal Thickeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphadenopathy can occur with both IBD and lymphoma, although any changes present are often more marked with lymphoma than with enteritis. 1,6,13 Furthermore, normal intestinal wall thickness and an absence of mesenteric lymph node changes do not exclude the possibility of low-grade lymphoma. 14 Therefore, since there is substantial overlap in the appearance of both disease processes on ultrasound, further tests including full thickness surgical biopsy, immuno-histochemistry and clonality analysis should be considered.…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Wall Thickening: Diffuse Vs Focal Thickeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thoracic radiographs and abdominal sonographic findings were relatively unremarkable aside from the slightly thickened small bowel with a prominent muscularis layer. Though this can be seen with chronic enteritis, inflammatory bowel disease, or lymphoma among others, in this case, it may have been due to the vasculopathy from FSRA . The cytologic and PCR evidence of a Mycoplasma infection in this patient is thought to be an incidental, unrelated finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%