2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.68.193302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gate-induced ionization of single dopant atoms

Abstract: Gate-induced wave function manipulation of a single dopant atom is a possible basis of atomic scale electronics. From this perspective, we analyzed the effect of a small nearby gate on a single dopant atom in a semiconductor up to field ionization. The dopant is modeled as a hydrogenlike impurity and the Schrödinger equation is solved by a variational method. We find that-depending on the separation of the dopant and the gate-the electron transfer is either gradual or abrupt, defining two distinctive regimes f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19] Much attention has been devoted to modeling the hyperfine and exchange interactions in these devices. [11][12][13][14][15][20][21][22][23][24] Intervalley interference between degenerate conduction band minima in Si has been shown to lead to oscillations in the exchange coupling as a function of the donor pair positioning in the lattice. [12][13][14][15] This poses serious problems for the fabrication of these devices, and leads to an extreme sensitivity of the exchange energy on the relative orientation of the P atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] Much attention has been devoted to modeling the hyperfine and exchange interactions in these devices. [11][12][13][14][15][20][21][22][23][24] Intervalley interference between degenerate conduction band minima in Si has been shown to lead to oscillations in the exchange coupling as a function of the donor pair positioning in the lattice. [12][13][14][15] This poses serious problems for the fabrication of these devices, and leads to an extreme sensitivity of the exchange energy on the relative orientation of the P atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is no theory to determine how the weight of a donor wavefunction will redistribute among the six conduction valleys in the presence of a generic (i.e., low symmetry) potential. Since the envelope functions in different valleys have different energies (due to anisotropy of the effective mass), this is an important question.In the context of quantum computing, several recent papers obtain tractible results for donor ionization, by ignoring valley-orbit interactions [4,5,6]. This singlevalley approach provides a useful picture of the distorted envelopes in the individual valleys.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of quantum computing, several recent papers obtain tractible results for donor ionization, by ignoring valley-orbit interactions [4,5,6]. This singlevalley approach provides a useful picture of the distorted envelopes in the individual valleys.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, this charge noise was not measurable in the nominally intrinsic sample (n = 1×10 14 cm −3 ). We therefore infer that its origin is electrons tunneling from their phosphorus donors [8,9]. While this ionization effect can occur for both substrates, in the intentionally doped material a larger and more easily measurable charge redistribution is present due to the higher doping density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%