2010
DOI: 10.5172/jamh.9.1.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gatekeeper training for caregivers and professionals: A variation on suicide prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problems arise when evaluating suicide prevention studies, as the most objective measure of effectiveness is a reduction in the number of completed suicides (Swanke & Buila, 2010). Low incidence rates and resulting low statistical power preclude the assessment of suicide as a primary outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Problems arise when evaluating suicide prevention studies, as the most objective measure of effectiveness is a reduction in the number of completed suicides (Swanke & Buila, 2010). Low incidence rates and resulting low statistical power preclude the assessment of suicide as a primary outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gatekeeper training 'teaches specific groups of people to identify people at high risk for suicide and then to refer those people for treatment' (Isaac et al, 2009, p. 261). While there is no consistent evidence to suggest that gatekeeper training alone decreases existing rates of suicide, such programmes are seen as one of the most important components of broader suicide prevention strategies Isaac et al, 2009;Swanke & Buila, 2010). Gatekeeper training is often integrated into multifaceted strategies aimed at educating community facilitators on identifying signs of depression and suicidal behaviour and referring to appropriate services (Cross, Matthieu, Lezine, & Knox, 2010;Knox, Litts, Talcott, Feig, & Caine, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the majority of the reviewed studies (16) implemented programs that were administered by mental health professionals or certified trainers. Only one program, the conference‐based intervention, included FFSI in the program's deliverance (Swanke & Dobie Buila, 2010). While this review highlighted an apparent gap in the literature surrounding GKT programs developed specifically for FFSI, it was also found that many programs are conducted without the unique insight offered by these individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perception may not be specific to family given that people experiencing suicidal thoughts may not believe that others can help (Burton Denmark, Hess, & Becker, 2012; Eskin, 2003). There is no way to know whether attempt survivors are getting information elsewhere, but building confidence in family members as resource hubs (e.g., attempt-survivor support groups and websites) certainly complements recommendations for kin- and caregiver-focused gatekeeper training (e.g., Swanke & Buila, 2010). Our post hoc results, which showed that greater social support was correlated with less perceived stigma and concealment, reinforce the benefits of developing family support networks for attempt survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family members represent key social actors who comprise the core of social networks among certain high-risk groups, such as people with serious mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, affective disorders; Goldberg, Rollins, & Lehman, 2003; Pernice-Duca, 2008), and are optimally positioned to affect suicidal behavior (Frey, Hans, & Sanford, 2016). Family members are essentially “on the front lines” in that they are more likely to witness warning signs and have the opportunity to respond to them (e.g., Swanke & Buila, 2010). As a result, family members can help to reduce suicide risk by linking loved ones in crisis to mental health care (Frey et al, 2017; Fulginiti et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%