Sociologists have tended to frame medical gatekeeping as an exclusionary social
practice, delineating how practitioners and clerical staff police the moral boundaries of
medicine by keeping out patients who are categorized as ‘bad,’
‘deviant,’ or otherwise problematic. Yet medical gatekeeping, understood
more broadly, can include not only keeping patients out of particular
clinical settings, but also redirecting them to alternative sources of care. In this
article, I draw on qualitative analysis of audio-recorded patient-provider interactions in
a United States emergency department (ED) to illustrate medical gatekeeping as a two-step
process of, first, categorizing certain patient complaints as unsuitable for treatment
within a particular setting, and second, diverting patients to alternative sites for care.
I refer to these as the restrictive and facilitative
components of medical gatekeeping to denote how each relates to patients’ access
to care, recognizing that both components of medical gatekeeping are part of a coordinated
organizational strategy for managing resource scarcity. By illustrating how ED providers
reveal intimate knowledge of structural vulnerabilities in diverting socioeconomically
disadvantaged patients with chronic back pain to clinical sites that are better equipped
to provide care, I suggest that we rethink the emphasis on restrictive practices in
sociological accounts of medical gatekeeping.