2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00683.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gatekeepers or advocates? Occupational therapists and equipment funding schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As prescribers are often complicit with the administration of discriminatory government funding policies, they may represent a barrier to attaining needed mobility resources (27). This suggests that there needs to be a re-alignment of the power relationship that exists between prescribers and device users, so that more collaborative relationships can be fostered, congruent with our commitment to client-centred practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As prescribers are often complicit with the administration of discriminatory government funding policies, they may represent a barrier to attaining needed mobility resources (27). This suggests that there needs to be a re-alignment of the power relationship that exists between prescribers and device users, so that more collaborative relationships can be fostered, congruent with our commitment to client-centred practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even occupational therapists' own research reveals evidence of therapists who "prescribe" activities (25), who are willing gate-keepers to the equipment, resources, and services clients need (41,46), who are detached and superior (37), sarcastic, disinterested, and indifferent (40), and who use such strategies of professional dominance as persuasion, coercion, and intimidation (47): expressions of power incompatible with client-centred protestations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Significantly, 18.6% of the AT device categories listed in the ISO are present on the State funding equipment list. The implications of this more than 80% shortfall is that, where users cannot self-fund, prescribers are substantially limited in the AT devices they can provide [31]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%