Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems 2018
DOI: 10.5220/0006800700690080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gathering and Combining Semantic Concepts from Multiple Knowledge Bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus also detect two concepts from dierent participants as the same, whenever they match one of the above rules. Paulus et al describe in [34] how one can unify these possible inconsistencies for names and data attributes.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We thus also detect two concepts from dierent participants as the same, whenever they match one of the above rules. Paulus et al describe in [34] how one can unify these possible inconsistencies for names and data attributes.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a concept is not present in the knowledge graph, it needs to be added. To propose concepts suggestions to the user, which are thoroughly specied according to the above criteria, the user wizard queries external knowledge bases based on the framework provided by Paulus et al [34] as depicted in Figure 2. This framework already gathers and combines semantic concepts from multiple knowledge bases.…”
Section: User Wizardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, this on-demand expansion has the disadvantage that it may lead to inconsistencies or undefined relationships. Therefore, our research in ESKAPE also focuses on automatically detecting and aligning of vocabularies, e.g., by detecting synonyms based on the framework provided by Paulus et al [21], whereas current tagging systems or the automatic collection of meta-data do not deal with the alignment of the used terms/labels of the vocabulary. This reduces the effort for manual alignment of vocabularies.…”
Section: A T L Rmentioning
confidence: 99%