2005
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1471-05.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gating Reaction Mechanisms for NMDA Receptor Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
88
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptual Models of GluN1/GluN2B Receptor Activation. In recent years, a number of conceptual models for NMDA receptor gating have been proposed (Banke and Traynelis, 2003;Popescu and Auerbach, 2003;Auerbach and Zhou, 2005;Erreger et al, 2005;Schorge et al, 2005;Dravid et al, 2008;Kussius and Popescu, 2009). Together with structural information, these conceptual models may allow determination of steps involved in receptor activation that define macroscopic currents and synaptic activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual Models of GluN1/GluN2B Receptor Activation. In recent years, a number of conceptual models for NMDA receptor gating have been proposed (Banke and Traynelis, 2003;Popescu and Auerbach, 2003;Auerbach and Zhou, 2005;Erreger et al, 2005;Schorge et al, 2005;Dravid et al, 2008;Kussius and Popescu, 2009). Together with structural information, these conceptual models may allow determination of steps involved in receptor activation that define macroscopic currents and synaptic activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one pair of positions, GluN1(Leu-819) and GluN2A(Phe-637), we also observed an interaction with respect to apparent desensitization. NMDA receptors exhibit multiple forms of apparent desensitization or macroscopic current decay in the prolonged presence of agonist (54); the conditions we used in this study were designed to minimize the influence of forms of current decay other than true desensitization, which refers to sojourns of the liganded receptor in one or more long-lived closed states (55)(56)(57) and thus is a form of ion channel gating. In the NMDA receptor, the M3 domain is primarily responsible for gating of the ion channel (46 -48, 51), and we and others have shown that the M4 domain regulates gating of the ion channel (36,52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this structural feature were shared by NMDA receptors, and four pre-M1 helices were to move independently in the agonist-bound receptor, one might imagine these conformational changes could constitute rate limiting and kinetically distinct steps that precede concerted channel opening involving simultaneous rearrangement of all four M3 helices. Single channel studies of agonist-bound NMDA receptors have identified multiple kinetically distinguishable steps that precede channel opening via a concerted pore dilation involving all or no repositioning of M3 transmembrane helices Popescu and Auerbach, 2003;Auerbach and Zhou, 2005;Erreger et al, 2005a;Schorge et al, 2005;Dravid et al, 2008). These rate-limiting and kinetically distinct steps must reflect rate limiting conformational changes that occur before rapid pore dilation (Schorge et al, 2005).…”
Section: Glutamate Receptor Ion Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%