2002
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1090351123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge-Fixing Constant Scalar Curvature Equations on Ruled Manifolds and the Futaki Invariants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of Theorem , we will deform the metric ωk by deforming the metrics ωB and hE in order to obtain, after another deformation, a sequence of Kähler cone metrics that have almost constant scalar curvature. Then we will apply the contraction mapping theorem, following the main idea of . Proposition Assume ωB is cscK with conical singularities along D with Hölder exponent α and angle 2πβ satisfying Condition and such that Lie(AutDfalse(B,[ωB]false)) is trivial.…”
Section: Construction Of Csck Cone Metrics Over Projective Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In view of Theorem , we will deform the metric ωk by deforming the metrics ωB and hE in order to obtain, after another deformation, a sequence of Kähler cone metrics that have almost constant scalar curvature. Then we will apply the contraction mapping theorem, following the main idea of . Proposition Assume ωB is cscK with conical singularities along D with Hölder exponent α and angle 2πβ satisfying Condition and such that Lie(AutDfalse(B,[ωB]false)) is trivial.…”
Section: Construction Of Csck Cone Metrics Over Projective Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of it is natural to ask whether Theorem admits a generalization in the case the base manifold B admits non‐trivial holomorphic vector fields. As in the smooth case, this will not be automatically happen, and an extra condition on (B,D) will be required.…”
Section: Further Applications and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular we are not assuming ω is a unique solution of the twisted extremal equation. We shall see in Remark 11 that the uniqueness assumption in Fine's result is analogous to Hong's assumption that the base has no automorphisms in Hong's first result [18], and thus the corollary above is analogous to Hong's second result [19]. Surprisingly, while Hong had to assume that the vector bundle E he considers is Aut(X, L)-invariant in [19], we do not need to make any such an assumption on the fibration X → B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We shall see in Remark 11 that the uniqueness assumption in Fine's result is analogous to Hong's assumption that the base has no automorphisms in Hong's first result [18], and thus the corollary above is analogous to Hong's second result [19]. Surprisingly, while Hong had to assume that the vector bundle E he considers is Aut(X, L)-invariant in [19], we do not need to make any such an assumption on the fibration X → B. Thus our main result proves also the analogous result of Hong's most recent work described above [20], and also that of Lu-Seyyedali [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation