2012
DOI: 10.1007/jhep08(2012)119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge fluxes in F-theory and type IIB orientifolds

Abstract: Abstract:We provide a detailed correspondence between G 4 gauge fluxes in F-theory compactifications with SU (n) and SU (n) × U (1) gauge symmetry and their Type IIB orientifold limit. Based on the resolution of the relevant F-theory Tate models, we classify the factorisable G 4 -fluxes and match them with the set of universal D5-tadpole free U (1)-fluxes in Type IIB. Where available, the global version of the universal spectral cover flux corresponds to Type IIB gauge flux associated with a massive diagonal U… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
236
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
15
236
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around here, the fiber equation (65) locally has the binomial structure of a deformed Kodaira I 2 equation x y = z 1 z 2 , which describes nothing but this SU (2) R gauge symmetry [26,27,33,34]. Therefore the small resolution gives the P 1 fiber (66) over the locus P e c = 0, which we now call S .…”
Section: Matter Curves For (31)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Around here, the fiber equation (65) locally has the binomial structure of a deformed Kodaira I 2 equation x y = z 1 z 2 , which describes nothing but this SU (2) R gauge symmetry [26,27,33,34]. Therefore the small resolution gives the P 1 fiber (66) over the locus P e c = 0, which we now call S .…”
Section: Matter Curves For (31)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, one hint can be embedding all the groups in a unified group, which would provide a two-form for the Abelian group in a similar fashion to the non-Abelian group. The socalled U (1)-restricted model was the first successful model to describe such a global U (1) cycle for SU (5) × U (1) by embedding the U (1) group into SU (2) [26][27][28][29][30]. However, this process heavily depends on a clever choice of ansatz unique to SU (5), and extending this technique to the general gauge group is not straightforward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In presence of such fluxes, the chiral index of matter in representation R localised on matter curve C R ⊂ B is given by the topological intersection number [49,50,52,[136][137][138][139][140] …”
Section: Fluxes and Chiral Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is beautifully solved in F-theory models, where such a coupling arises at a non-perturbative point of E 6 enhancement [5][6][7][8]. Such enhancement points signal that the brane configuration is not smoothly connected in moduli space to a well-defined Type IIB limit [43,44] and one should think of the matter states as arising from multi-pronged [p, q]-strings, which are perturbatively absent. Equivalently, the underlying reason for existence of a 10 10 5 coupling in F-theory is that the structure of U (1) gauge symmetries in F-theory can be much more general than in the subclass of perturbative Type IIB models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a singularity is a serious problem, especially for GUT model building, as it makes the theory at weak coupling ill-defined for any kind of computation. These conifold singularites can be avoided at the cost of working with elliptic fibrations for which the conifold points a 1 = σ = a 2,1 = 0 do not actually occur due to the intersection theory of the base [45]. Such geometries can be algorithmically constructed starting from type IIB, as explained in [36].…”
Section: Absractmentioning
confidence: 99%