2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.81.114010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge-invariant decomposition of nucleon spin

Abstract: We investigate the relation between the known decompositions of the nucleon spin into its constituents, thereby clarifying in what respect they are common and in what respect they are different essentially. The decomposition recently proposed by Chen et al. can be thought of as a nontrivial generalization of the gauge-variant Jaffe-Manohar decomposition so as to meet the gauge-invariance requirement of each term of the decomposition. We however point out that there is another gaugeinvariant decomposition of th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
183
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
183
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to unambiguously define what is meant by gluon spin and orbital angular momentum, Chen et al proposed to split the gauge field into a pure-gauge term and a physical term [2][3][4][5] A μ (x) = A pure μ (x) + A phys μ (x) (1) satisfying specific gauge transformation laws…”
Section: Chen Et Al Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to unambiguously define what is meant by gluon spin and orbital angular momentum, Chen et al proposed to split the gauge field into a pure-gauge term and a physical term [2][3][4][5] A μ (x) = A pure μ (x) + A phys μ (x) (1) satisfying specific gauge transformation laws…”
Section: Chen Et Al Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is precisely (16). Similarly, I can define the canonical gluon OAM density L g can (x) and analyze its twist structure.…”
Section: Twist Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea to use the 'physical part' of the gauge field was originally due to Chen et al 6 (see also Ref. 7), and the notations A phys and D pure are borrowed from their work. However, the explicit form (7) is different from theirs.…”
Section: Complete Gauge Invariant Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%