2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2018)074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge-invariant observables, gravitational dressings, and holography in AdS

Abstract: This paper explores construction of gauge (diffeomorphism)-invariant observables in anti de Sitter (AdS) space and the related question of how to find a "holographic map" providing a quantum equivalence to a boundary theory. Observables are constructed perturbatively to leading order in the gravitational coupling by gravitationally dressing local field theory operators in order to solve the gravitational constraints. Many such dressings are allowed and two are explicitly examined, corresponding to a gravitatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This seems to imply that the algebra of operators outside U , and in particular the boundary algebra, does not contain observables that can distinguish these different states, and hence that the boundary algebra must not be complete. This conclusion is in tension with BU, and with what is known about bulk reconstruction in AdS/CFT, but there is is no contradiction: the splitting analysis was perturbative on one time slice, whereas the boundary time evolution that plays a role in BU and bulk reconstruction, or translation of bulk operators to the boundary [24], is nonperturbative.…”
Section: B Perturbative Nebulon?mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This seems to imply that the algebra of operators outside U , and in particular the boundary algebra, does not contain observables that can distinguish these different states, and hence that the boundary algebra must not be complete. This conclusion is in tension with BU, and with what is known about bulk reconstruction in AdS/CFT, but there is is no contradiction: the splitting analysis was perturbative on one time slice, whereas the boundary time evolution that plays a role in BU and bulk reconstruction, or translation of bulk operators to the boundary [24], is nonperturbative.…”
Section: B Perturbative Nebulon?mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…We speak of dynamical correlation, and avoid the concept of "entanglement," because the latter refers to a state in a Hilbert space composed of two or more factors. In the setting of quantum gravity, however, a tensor factorization according to spatial localization is not available [22][23][24][25]. Moreover, the particles or field quanta referred to in the previous paragraph are not gauge invariant with respect to diffeomorphisms; and, if they are gravitationally dressed in order to become so, then they are no longer spatially localized.…”
Section: Boundary Information Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that poles are particles, we appear to have generated a new light particle from ultraviolet dynamics. 6 The interpretation of the new pole can be sharpened by considering more carefully the criteria for renormalizability in Wilsonian EFT. In a Wilsonian picture, we upgrade our Lagrangian parameters to running parameters, and define our theory at the scale Λ as…”
Section: −γmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was noted in Section 2 and is now on prime display, the physics of the theory with nonperturbative θ-dependence is starkly different from that of any truncation. 6 Although there is no pole at finite Λ, a scale is still induced in the form of an infrared cutoff ∼ Λ 2 θ /Λ.…”
Section: −γmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And in fact, construction of dressed operators, corresponding to gauge invariant observables, either in EM [9] or in gravity [10] 2 strongly suggest that antipodal symmetry is not a general feature of field configurations. For example, a simple example of an operator dressed by a gravitational line arises from considering diffeomorphism-invariant operators associated to Fefferman-Graham gauge in AdS [13]. These operators create a gravitational field with field lines narrowly concentrated in a particular direction, and clearly violate antipodal symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%