2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-012-0512-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge Transformations, Twisted Poisson Brackets and Hamiltonization of Nonholonomic Systems

Abstract: In this paper we study the problem of Hamiltonization of nonholonomic systems from a geometric point of view. We use gauge transformations by 2-forms (in the sense ofŠevera and Weinstein [29]) to construct different almost Poisson structures describing the same nonholonomic system. In the presence of symmetries, we observe that these almost Poisson structures, although gauge related, may have fundamentally different properties after reduction, and that brackets that Hamiltonize the problem may be found within … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
141
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
141
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The gyroscopic tensor actually coincides, up to a sign, with the tensor field C considered by Koiller [28,Proposition 8.5] and Cantrijn et al [11, Page 337] (see [21]). 2 The form of the equations (2.2) and (2.7) indicates that there is an interesting connection between the gyroscopic coefficients and the structure coefficients of other sophisticated geometric frameworks that have been developed to formulate the equations of motion of nonholonomic systems [23,30]. Theorem 2.1 (Cantrijn et al [11]).…”
Section: Invariant Measures For Chaplygin Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The gyroscopic tensor actually coincides, up to a sign, with the tensor field C considered by Koiller [28,Proposition 8.5] and Cantrijn et al [11, Page 337] (see [21]). 2 The form of the equations (2.2) and (2.7) indicates that there is an interesting connection between the gyroscopic coefficients and the structure coefficients of other sophisticated geometric frameworks that have been developed to formulate the equations of motion of nonholonomic systems [23,30]. Theorem 2.1 (Cantrijn et al [11]).…”
Section: Invariant Measures For Chaplygin Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial amount of research in nonholonomic mechanics in recent years has focused on Hamiltonisation (see e.g. [7,13,15,14,8,16,26,20,5,2,6] and the references therein). Roughly speaking this is the process by which, via symmetry reduction and a time reparametrisation, the equations of motion of certain nonholonomic systems take a Hamiltonian form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is of great interest to determine geometric conditions, usually related with symmetry, that lead to the existence of invariants of the flow, such as first integrals, volume forms and Poisson or symplectic structures (see e.g. [36,6,11,52,19,13,15,2,9,21] and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper explores the connection between the presence of conserved quantities for a nonholonomic system and its hamiltonization, as raised in [31]. Using the geometric techniques developed in [1,3], we show that, for certain types of symmetries admitting conserved quantities, one can distinguish particular 2-forms that can be used to modify the classical nonholonomic bracket (by means of gauge transformations); the reduction of such modified brackets to the orbit space are genuine Poisson brackets, relative to which the reduced equations of motion are hamiltonian. We show that all conditions for this procedure to work are met for a concrete set of examples, namely solids of revolution rolling on a plane without sliding as well as the classical example of an inhomogeneous ball rolling on a plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
In this paper we study the relation between conserved quantities of nonholonomic systems and the hamiltonization problem employing the geometric methods of [1,3]. We illustrate the theory with classical examples describing the dynamics of solids of revolution rolling without sliding on a plane.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%